If you had actually witnessed the latest instalment in Mr Child's clear and obvious vendetta against widnes you would know that 'madness' is very much an understatement for the outright bias shown by that twonk on sunday. A vendetta he has pursued with a complete lack of professionalism since his championship debut officiating a game between us and Oldham. A game in which he started with several massive clangers, got some stick from the crowd, obviously took it personally and has continued to grind that particular axe against us ever since. without any shame or any attempt to hide it. You know its bad when you have die hard saints fans saying they couldnt believe how biased he was.

If you can have 25 blokes pushing and shoving but only one punishable 'punch' I'd be very surprised. There was no 'coming together' until Wilkin and LMS got involved.

It was poor officiating to punish one side for that. Simple as. About ten different reasons given as to why only Clarke but simple answer even by many fans is it made little / no sense.

according to SL Full Time the penalty count was 10-9 in Widnes' favour.

]

Yet Saints got at least three penalties in the second half, just for high tackles.

But hey, why let the facts get in the way of a good "Widnes were robbed" rant.

IF people refuse to even acknowledge that theres a centre ground, its hard to debate with them.

You where on about this particular incident... The fact penalty counts always tend to even themselves out in games is another matter.

For a start, it wasn't a brawl, nothing happened. And that's what I heard/what I thought from what I saw.