First post so please be gentle!

The whole idea of having a SL club linked with a championship club is good idea. The number of players registered on dual registration is the problem, I believe that if you are in a SL teams first 21 then the chances are you are and have been a professional sportsman for a number of years. If you are at this level you shouldn't have too much difficulty getting yourself up to speed when coming back from an injury (you know if you are fit enough, you have trained for a living and know your body, you may need to come off the bench to get to match fitness but that's the nature of the job)

If you are in the clubs top 21 (I'm talking first choice player not squad numbers) then you should not be dual registered. After this I believe then you are looking at players which will enhance a championship side/keep the player on his toes, and will make a coach think about who is best for the match ahead. It should make the semi pro player up his game if he wants his appearance money, and the SL player will want to shine and prove his quality to his real boss.

I'm a Wire fan and I think it's wrong that Woody is playing for Swinton, as for Tyrone, he's still developing (even with his finals experiences) and is the type of player that can enhance the Championship.

Unfortunately a Championship player is going to lose money no matter what unless the SL player donates his appearance fee to the player he displaced.....and that's never going to happen!

It isnt the wrong term. It is the correct term. You just dont like it because it goes against your argument. It is right and it is healthy and it is good that players play at a level which correlates with their ability and development. That will mean that the best players will play at the top level, players not quite good enough, or not quite there in their development will play in the leagues below. If they improve to a sufficient level they will move up leagues, if a player loses form or fitness and fall below that level they will drop a level. I dont see why you have a problem with that.

there is nothing unworkable about it. It would be quite easy to administrate and would work. The issue would be convincing the 5/6 clubs who have got it right at the moment to give up the competitive advantage they have earned.

My last post to you as you are clearly what you insult others with re labels. My posts are genuine and bar 1 mistake they are correct. You are the type of person that give internet forums a bad reputation. Respond or not I will not reply.

It isnt one mistake. if you werent a troll you would have gone and checked and realised you made quite a few errors. I even ppointed you toward them. But you didnt, because you were on a wind up and you already knew them to be wrong.

Hunslet try to explain why they are doing what they are doing........... www.hunslethawks.co.uk/news-327- ... ement.html

Hunslet try to explain why they are doing what they are doing........... www.hunslethawks.co.uk/news-327- ... ement.html

We are not Australian or American, we are British. Look at all the major sports in this country. All gobbling up the big sponsorships because people turn up and watch competitive sport. Oh and smokey dear boy ....... Nah i can't be bothered.