Quote roughyedspud="roughyedspud"most of what you just said is so one eyed it's just plain stupid
'"
As opposed to some ridiculous idea: "I know, let's create ANOTHER artificial team"!!
Quote roughyedspud1. please prove that Great britian RL is a far bigger brand than England RL.....i'd bet you a pint that the RFL earns for money from england than they did from GB..'"
Any evidence? I won't argue they don't - it's probably easier with online marketing and an online retail outlet.
But I'd bet a pint with a similar set-up for Great Britain alongside England, they could earn more.
Quote roughyedspud2. aside from getting your memorable wins mixed up lol.....how england beating the reigning world champions in 2009 to make the 4 nations final.....and beating the reigning 4nations champions to make the 2011 4nations final how they are'nt memorable moment just goes to show how blinkered you are...'"

You're using a couple of wins against NZ as proof of how strong 'England RL' are? They're almost as inconsistent as we are! 2 wins against NZ, zero wins against Aus - we can't even beat the Exiles!!
Quote roughyedspudintroduce the "celtic tigers" and then england won't be the only touring team would they!
bring back GB now and players like brough,mcllorum,evans,bridge,harrison etc will still opt to switch to england because england play in big comps every year! so it would'nt make any difference if they have the chance to play for GB every 4 years!!
having the celtic tigers play in big games every year,against england or playing off v france for 4 nations or going on tours down under...GIVES PLAYERS A REASON TO STICK WITH WALES,SCOTLAND OR IRELAND...'"

Another fake team for meaningless games...just what RL needs. Wonderful.
People with Celtic roots are generally very proud of them. Give them the option to play for that country and they'll generally snap it up. However, while Wales, Scotland and Ireland are -poor teams mostly competing in meaningless competitions, and while England are still the only ones guaranteed regular games against the big boys, their best players will always opt for England. Reintroduce GB and these players can opt for Wales, etc while still getting a shot at big games/tours against the big guns - exactly as happened in the past! I'm not sure what's do difficult to understand about that?
A Celtic team would still be a -poor team, made up predominantly of Welsh players. They would still get spanked by England, NZ or Aus, indeed any SL or NRL side. Utterly, completely pointless. Top level players are not going to flock to the 'Celtic Tigers' (lol) banner.
Quote roughyedspudand another thing.......i've yet to hear from anyone official from wales,scotland or ireland support bring back GB...and i doubt we will.'"
Shock. Someone working for the Welsh, Scottish or Irish RL doesn't support the reintroduction of an international entity above their level? Well there's a surprise.
Quote roughyedspudduring the final years of GB (2001-2007) can you tell me the level of development of the game in wales,scotland & ireland...........i'll answer that for you...ABSOLUTELY COCK ALL!
now go look at whats happened in wales since 2008....and tell everyone "its heavily flawed" '"
Tell me about some development in Wales that is a DIRECT consequence of the removal of GB?
The rise of Crusaders and now South Wales probably have more to do with the growth of the game, plus the RFL introducing development officers and generally pulling their fingers out as far as development is concerned - and not just in Wales.
And please explain why the existence of a GB should adversely affect the development of the sport in Wales? It gives Welsh players something to aspire to, it gives players with Welsh roots more incentive to opt for Wales, it brings Welsh support to the GB banner.
GB is a team, not a national development operation. The players gather probably every other year and play in GB shirts. They don't need development funds, development officers, permanent facilities, etc - all they need are operational funds every so often and some marketing funds. There is no reason is should detract from any development.
Quote roughyedspudps wales under 18's beat scotland under 18's at the weekend.......that would'nt have happened 6 years ago..'"
??? A Wales u-18s wouldn't have beaten a Scotland u-18s 6 years ago? Were Scotland u-18s a dominant force 6 years ago? WTF are you on about? Actually, it DID happen - and more than 6 years ago:
Home Nations Championship 2004: Wales 34 Scotland 28
Friendly Match 2005: Wales 36 Scotland 12
European Championships 2006: Wales 14 Scotland 14 (ooh nearly a win!)
Home Nations Championship 2007: Scotland 10 Wales 68
Home Nations Championship 2009: Wales 30 Scotland 6
Quote roughyedspudbut yeah scrapping GB was heavily flawed'"
Yes, it was.