The Salary Cap would have probably worked if it had stayed at 50% of a clubs income and not changed to a fix amount. Had it stayed at 50% then clubs wouldn't be able to spend money they don't have which they appear to be doing now by spending £1.6m

Whilst this desciptin of events could well be true and paints a different scene than the one of Wane jumping on the microphone to demand his opposition players are banned, don't we remeber the day when a coach would have said something like
"We're concentrating on our own game, not on Danny McGuire."
?

"I dont think Danny should have faced any games - just like Micky shouldnt have faced any games. But once The RFL have gone down that avenue like with Micky, they have set a precedent."

He remains firmly on-message, in that the myth being peddled is that both players committed identical offences, when any fair-minded and vaguely sentient person can see that they didn't.

Hey ho - to use a few Stevoisms, it should be a 'humdinger' or indeed, a 'wow of a game.'

What myth? All that's being said is that neither player should have faced a ban, there's no hint of the same or even similar offences.

Just like the myth's that can be read in the last week about Wigan, on this very page there's the myth of Sean O' not tackling below the neck for example.

Can Burrow actually play the ball without crawling forward out of the tackle?

i hope the wait was worth it.