Yes apparantly so and a completely baffling one at that. A bad decision doesn't make the system incorrect however.

It just gets worse as EA say that they may not be able to include Rangers in FIFA 13 as their licensing arrangement is only with the Scottish Premier League (source MCV).

Dundee did just that in 2010 (through administration) and get into the SPL in 2012 funny old world.

distinction without a difference.

The TV rights contract isnt dependent on any other clubs other than Rangers and celtic. If Rangers stay down for more than one year, that contract will be ripped up and the £20m a season currently pumped in to scottish football will drop to about half that. 4 Clubs in last years SPL averaged under 5k, 5 others averaged under 10k. What kind of impact is a loss of £900k a year in tv rights going to make to those clubs? Especially considering that one of their two biggest attendances are lost as well.
This isnt just a temporary thing, this will probably destroy Scottish football completely. TV's interest in Scottish Football starts and ends with the old firm. The next 4 years will see a massively lower TV rights, and much lower interest. The players leaving Rangers arent going to other Scottish clubs, they are leaving scotland, Celtic have no need, to have a better squad next season than this, They finished 31 points ahead of motherwell in 3rd place. Why would they keep on their big earners or sign new quality players? its just money down the drain. The likes of Ledley, Wanyama, Izaguirre, Commons et al will leave and not be replaced by the same quality. Without the tv money and gate money from rangers other SPL clubs will go bust, They will have to be dropped to the 3rd division and they will be replaced by smaller clubs who will in turn negatively affect the value of the league.

Rangers spend more than a year out of the SPL, the SPL is gone.

I think Rangers going into the 3rd tier is a lot worse for Scottish football than the Bulls or any other club in the SL being demoted. In the scottish footbal is based largely around the Old Firm, lets be honest no team in rugby league could possibly have that effect.

Smokey,
In a sentence,what do you think should happen to Bradford Bulls ?

The irony of it being Dundee,to replace Rangers,really hits the heights.Dundee invited into their club,some years ago,an individual who is certainly up there as a 'fit and proper person' where the only surprise is that he isn't from Yorkshire and in charge of a club or employed by the RFL.
[url=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Giovanni_Di_Stefano_(businessman)This charmer[/url

[url=http://sport.stv.tv/football/clubs/dundee/199076-ken-bates-saddam-and-dundee-fc-the-full-giovanni-di-stefano-interview/Press Interview[/url

Dundee were deducted 25 points for entering administration a couple of years ago.

I dont know. It is entirely dependent on the new owners. Put simply, if the new owners are stable and looking to invest and build Bradford Bulls then i wouldnt relegate them to prove some point or gain some retribution. If we cant be sure they are stable, looking to invest and build Bradford Bulls then they should be relegated.

And who do you think is qualified to make that decision? , will they just ask them ? , or maybe check up on them? , get them to take a lie detector test or something ? , maybe a cash bond deposited with the RFL should be asked for? , that would sort out the real deal from the tyre kickers

The RFL in co-operation with other SL clubs.

A cash bond is a nonsense idea, only someone looking to put obstacles in place would suggest.

So they'll just ask them then?

And evidence it.