I had a great day yesterday and those that go seem to enjoy themselves in the main.

It's only the sad sacks who sit at home who seem to be the ones that moan about it.

There was a big stage with bands playing because someone I know was singing on there also there was loads of bouncy castles and little fun games to play when I went for a walk around.

I was also impressed by the amount of food things there was all around the stadium.

So basically everything he said they should have was already there!

I'm of a different opinion when it comes to the food outlets. Yeah, there was plenty, but they were all the same. No variety at all. In Edinburgh, there was all sorts on offer: steak, ribs, Chinese, chippy, burgers, Indian, etc. You can't eat the same cr*p for 8 hours on two days.

Also, if you wanna keep the punters in and around the ground, there needs to be more places you can drink. There were only two bars outside the ground, and they were completely rammed (you had to queue to get in and then queue again to get a drink!). People were leaving the area to find better places for food and drink. If they want to stop people leaving after their game, they've got to offer more around the ground.

I think Edinburgh got this spot on. And Cardiff didn't need to due to its location in the city centre.

DEFINITELY better when it's further into the summer!

It doesn't make a huge difference crowd figure wise who had a weekend ticket and who had a day ticket.

It does mean the event is worth less to the local economy meaning a local authority would be less keen to pay us.

It does make a huge difference in terms of the number of individuals actually attending the event though (ie 60,000 different people over the two days rather than the same 30,000 on each day).

Indeed, as I said earlier it makes the event less attractive to prospective venue cities/towns as there is a cut in the number of beds, meals and beers sold due to day trippers.

I await next seasons WAFC attendance figures with baited breath