Quote: knockersbumpMKII "None of them are any good to be perfectly honest, rarely do they ever say anything that a true fan would say so nothing ever controversial that might upset the RFL (like criticism of the officials when they furk up)'"
Isn't that what makes a commentator good?! It p*sses me off no end when Eddie and Stevo spend more time talking about an incident that happened 10 minutes ago than they do talking about the game in front of them (and are often wrong about said incident).
Commentators commentate. Analysers analyse. They aren't there to be controversial.
Quote: knockersbumpMKII "RF was pretty good BITD but is a bit too long in the tooth & far to many errors though till has a far better style than Woods IMO.'"
The only thing I don't like about Woods is that he doesn't sound like he's genuinely enthused by the game, he's just talking about it.
French just can't keep up anymore. It's embarrassing at times how bad he is. And they've given him the Catalans game, where no doubt well hear "Thomas Bosh" said 1000x, as well as the weight of the pack and the address of each players amateur club. Basically completely useless facts as filler.
Quote: knockersbumpMKII "Davies isn't a commentator, he's just the side kick analyser, nothing more, just that he gets a bit hyper critical at times.'"
Isn't being hypercritical what a true fan would do?