Quote: Him "No I'm not, I'm asking the people who are going around saying that that is what happened.'"
If you're going to ask everyone on a forum for evidence of everything they talk about you're going to be very busy and very frustrated. In this specific case nobody has claimed to have or even to have seen evidence, merely to have believable reports that such evidence exists.
Quote: Him "Has it been reported? Or rumoured? Big difference. It's also highly unlikely that anyone who was involved with "insider trading" would do so using the KC phone or email system.'"
It's been reported. And the folk involved were hardly Mensa candidates.
Quote: Him "Probably because Pearson hasn't gone quite so far as to specifically accuse one person or organisation, but his inferences were quite clear. Also the recent tribunal kind of shows it was all a load of bollllocks anyway.'"
You're aware that libel doesn't require a specific allegation, right? And that Hetherington has publicly said that Pearson made some serious accusation against him personally and the Leeds club?
The recent tribunal shows no such thing, unless you have [ievidence[/i (
) that those accusations were presented and properly investigated. Not to mention the RFL's proven track record in sweeping awkward stuff under the Red Hall carpet.