Charging away fans the same for a behind the sticks view as the home fans are charged for a seat along the side is out of order.

The Hull fans at the opposite end with the same view are charged less whichever way you look at it.

The RFL should look into this. Totally wrong IMO.

FFS. How hard can it be? Away fans may sit anywhere - they don't have to sit in the North Stand. What part of that is difficult to understand?

True but (I have no problem with it BTW) you could argue the fact that the tickets the away club sell (which gives them the 10% fee) are more expensive means that the away fans are infact being 'asked' to buy other tickets instead of ones that their own club could benefit from.
So it's either give 'us' the full amount or pay more.

we will soon see, its not FC fault that your ground isnt up to scratch for the derby now is it

because some people are too dense to see it that way, either that or they get off on MOANING all their lives. simple dont like it dont come.

So we gave you the better easter tie for fun then did we?
Thought not.

Hull: high prices, poor teams, welcoming locals

I think that the price is too high, but on the basis the away following of most clubs at the KC is dire, then I guess we have that right. On the basis FC contribute more to most superleague clubs than they do to us, then so be it.
Like I said though, I think it is too high, and if we could charge £15 and guarantee 2000 away fans then I am sure the club would do that.

Not sure if I've missed this, but most clubs sell tickets for their upcoming away games, what stand do Hull FC provide to to the away club to sell in advance?

or you could ring the club, (fc) in advance and book your tickets for any stand u wish to sit in and have them delivered or pick up on the day!

and wigan charge the away fans more to sit in the north stand at the jjb than they do with their own fans in the south stand!!

That wasn't the question he asked.