Charged with grade B intentional use of the forearm and will face disciplinary. www.rlfans.com/index.php?fid=41&id=262

Charged with grade B intentional use of the forearm and will face disciplinary. www.rlfans.com/index.php?fid=41&id=262

Exactly this. It seems only handful of wire fans that are trying to defend it; unfortunate they are the most vociferous handful.

If you want a sneak preview of what it would be like, read the threads about the high tackle on Lee Briers from our game against your lot.

d!ck

You'd have been hard pressed to find too many Giants fans defending it...

Bridge?

He sure is.

Yeah yeah, go take another look - there were certainly no one on the Giants forum

Jesus I'm kidding, hence the

and

smileys. I'll have to start putting massive disclaimers on posts in the future in 72 point font



As far as wire fans defending bridge goes, the few that have been have been pretty cringe worthy to read - As a very best case scenario in Bridge's favour you could argue that it was simply reckless as opposed to deliberate/hot-headed/thuggery. But that doesn't exonerate him and it's still behaviour that should result in a ban (After all, most high tackles that result in a ban are reckless technique as opposed to deliberate)

For me, I think he lost his head, ought to be 2 games, but will probably be reduced to 1 with an early guilty plea.

Fair point, I did think it was out of character for you...

I wonder if we will see an increase in Red cards on the next few weeks? Royce Simmons was bemoaning the 9-2 penalty count on Sunday but he didnt mention 6 of them at least were for high shots. It was very surprising that no one was sin binned.

Simmons would blame the ref if his toast was burned.