Quote: binks "TFC if you read back some of my posts i never said change worked in every case, fully agree Warrington, Both Hulls and Saints work well and in the Hull case changed back because it was better for them. But also accept that it has been a success for some clubs Cas Tigers, Bardford Bulls, Wakefield Wildcats ( except the badge maybe ) Huddersfield Giants and Salford City Reds IMHO are better with the new branding.
But life is an opionion and this is mine, the world is a better place when we are allowed our own without recourse.
Enjoy your day'"
I didn't mean you, apologies, I meant other posters in the thread.
With regards to clubs being a success with their respective nicknames I wouldn't be so sure, Wakefield have for the majority of their time in Super league struggled, Cas have been relegated twice, Bradford undoubtedly [iwere [/ivery successful, but now have fallen from grace, all 3 of these teams still have poor stadia. Again Huddersfield had a dire period after being nicknamed the Giants finishing bottom a few times and merging with Sheffield Eagles, Salford City Reds although having just acquired a new stadium have been another mediocre club having been relegated twice.
Like you say though we have our own opinions on what constitutes success and such things as branding, which of course hasn't been a complete failure, it is simply a matter of opinion. However I can agree to disagree quite happily, enjoy your evening sir.