FORUMS > The Virtual Terrace > NRL trialling rule changes - any good? |
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Club Owner | 20378 | |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Mar 2003 | 21 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Aug 2024 | Aug 2024 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
[b:3rwwi1cz][color=#800000:3rwwi1cz]WIGAN RLFC - SL ERA
WORLD CLUB CHAMPIONS 2017 & 2024
SUPER LEAGUE CHAMPIONS 1998, 2010, 2013, 2016, 2018 & 2023
CHALLENGE CUP FINAL WINNERS 2002, 2011, 2013, 2022 & 2024
LEAGUE LEADERS CHAMPIONS 2010, 2012, 2020 & 2023
ACADEMY GRAND FINAL WINNERS 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2017, 2018 & 2019
WOMEN’S GRAND FINAL WINNERS 2018
BEST SUPPORTED CLUB OF THE YEAR 2010, 2011 & 2012
CLUB OF THE YEAR 2010 & 2012
[/color:3rwwi1cz][/b:3rwwi1cz]: |
|
| Quote: Starbug "Total bollox'"
Agreed.
How about this for a Rule change?
1) Rule changes can only be "considered" once every five years.
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Star | 488 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Dec 2011 | 13 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Oct 2012 | Oct 2012 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
: |
|
| If the offence happens on 0 or 1 tackle then you dont really get any benefit. I understand its purpose and it sounds good, but when you think about it there are too many flawes. The other 2 are just stupid.
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Chairman | 5889 | |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Dec 2001 | 23 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Jul 2024 | Apr 2024 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
72_1436204362.png | [url=http://twitter.com/mklister:257u1mz5]Twitter[/url:257u1mz5] | [url=http://www.topcashback.co.uk/ref/lister:257u1mz5]TopCashBack[/url:257u1mz5] | [url=http://www.squadbuilder.co.uk/:257u1mz5]Warrington Wolves Squadbuilder[/url:257u1mz5] | [url=https://www.tcs.com:257u1mz5]Tata Consultancy Services[/url:257u1mz5]:d7dc4b20b2c2dd7b76ac6eac29d5604e_72.png |
|
| The wiping of the tackle count needs a bit of tweaking, in order to allow a team to quickly choose if they want to take the full penalty instead. I couldn't see if the ref(s) were signalling the penalties on TV, if they weren't they need to.
Other than that it does speed up the game and punishes wrestling techniques.
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 1421 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Dec 2007 | 17 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Nov 2014 | Nov 2014 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
"I've been rich & I've been poor. Rich is better." DLR: |
|
| Quote: jarvis12345 "If the offence happens on 0 or 1 tackle then you dont really get any benefit.'"
That's what I was aiming at when I posted this.
Quote: jarvis12345 "No 2 has some potential imo. From a technical infringement I’d give the non offending side the choice of a) taking a tap & resetting the tackle count, or b) kicking for touch & continuing the tackle count. Early in the tackle count sides may opt to take the metres from a kick, late in the count they’d probably opt for another set.'"
|
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 2071 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Oct 2006 | 18 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Oct 2014 | Mar 2012 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
29107.jpg gutterfax wrote:
Union has EVERYTHING to do with what league does.
Codarmysaint wrote:
No one cares about international rugby league:29107.jpg |
|
| Power play was bull- but I think the penalty awarded with a play on back to zero could have something if they tinker with it.
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 2071 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Oct 2006 | 18 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Oct 2014 | Mar 2012 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
29107.jpg gutterfax wrote:
Union has EVERYTHING to do with what league does.
Codarmysaint wrote:
No one cares about international rugby league:29107.jpg |
|
| With the 40/20 and last nights 50/30 or whatever it was, why not just have that kick from anywhere in your own half as long as you are behind the line and it goes in to touch 40 or whatever metres it is away?
Say you're near the half way line and you kick it out in the oppositions 10, it's the same as a 40/20 anyway isn't it, so the kick is just as skillful as a 40/20.
|
|
|
|
|
|