If we were to change names it would have to be 'Rugby' - absolutely nothing else, just 'Rugby'. We then have it as a registered trademark, any other sport ( union)would then be unable to shorten their name to just Rugby.
Incidentally, I would do something similar with the world cup - call it 'The World Cup'. As far as I know there isn't a competition with just this name at present.
It's all a bit radical and far thinking but it would make some serious headlines.

There are 14,400 Club Wembley seats. Hope that ends this nonsense now.

Damn, you beat me to it!

I love it when people emphasise "nothing", and then say "except" something.


Who is struggling more now than they were before? You're just generalising. You haven't given one example. You say "we lose we gain", but we've gained more than we've lost which is the opposite of what you've been saying.


Or be reasonable with your ambition.
All it has stopped is the boom and bust methods to get to the top that were oh so prevalent in the past.


"I'm not moaning, but..."
You are moaning. If you wasn't moaning, the post wouldn't be so negative and it would certainly include a lot more facts rather than speculation and generalisation.


They got announced to be in Championship 1 about a month ago IIRC, as the newly named North Wales Crusaders (same badge I think).


Who here has said that a name change for the sport would solve all the problems of the lower leagues?
Regardless, it's a terrible argument to not do something. "This one change will not solve all the problems, so it's not worth doing".


You said that "Rugby League is Super League now anyway". Those were your words, then you went into a huge rant about the licensing system.
RL is not SL. When people play the sport, they don't think SL. You've said it yourself here. So surely, that's basically the end of this argument.


You're pointing out using what facts though?
You keep trying to cover your agenda, but it's extremely transparent.
We are a developing sport. Developing sports change a lot. Get used to it.


How many of these are actually Welsh, Irish and Scottish?
Maybe instead of going for second-rate Celts, the RFL should work on getting clubs from these countries into the lower leagues to produce bonafide Celtic players? Wait, isn't that what they've been doing? How many Welsh lower league clubs 10 years ago? How many now?


Isn't there already some compensation in place for signing players under 21? (May need this confirming).
Very few players in SL come from the lower leagues. They usually come from SL player's academies. We discussed on another thread about partnerships between the lower leagues and the SL and most of the fans of the traditional clubs in the lower leagues rejected the idea. They either want money for nothing or to moan about how bad it is down there.


You are arguing about it.
And you've not suggested any other reasons (you've rejected the recession as being a reason), so so far you are blaming everything on the licence system. And you've not actually given a factual example of a decline in health. You've just stated that they're struggling (which they always have at this level). So where is the decline?



Ah, so this is what it comes down to. The game is different now to what it was then, and you're going to take the cynical approach to it.
You can keep saying "I'm not..." but you are moaning/arguing/against the changes in the game because it's different to when you started watching. Who are you trying to convince? Me or yourself?
You've tried to find as many negatives as possible (but you're not moaning). Where are the positives? Are there none? If you don't think there are, then what's the point?


As mentioned, the Challenge Cup is down to Club Wembley. Your lack of knowledge on this (yet happy to come to a negative conclusion) shows your cynical views on the game. No matter what it does, there'll be a negative that you will look at. And yet you offer no logical solutions.

I don't get it?

Why?

You would think you’d want to see a positive outcome, rather than a negative one?

But hey, if you’re happy with either…

My point is that it is more likely to be a detrimental move, or, at best, pointless and ineffective.


People, such as you, told us that licenceing would stop boom and bust. Has it?

There seems to be a proportionally higher rate of clubs going into administration and even going out of existence altogether, since licencing was introduced and not just in the Championships. Doncaster, Oldham, Blackpool, Wakefield and Crusaders, all within the space of the licence agreement. Some clubs, like Leigh are hanging in by the skin of their teeth.



Has it? Where are Barrow right now?



You see, you are clearly one of those people who puts his fingers in his ears, when confronted with something he doesn’t want to hear, regardless of any validity. If you don’t see it as positive you dismiss it. Calling it moaning is the usual tactic.

I am discussing what I feel to be a broad range of issues for the decline of the lower leagues, including licencing; giving reasons for why it is happening. Just because you think everything is wonderful with few problems, doesn’t make it moaning. And calling it moaning doesn’t make the point I am making any less valid.



Glad to hear it. I must have missed that, as I thought they were still in discussion with the RFL about it. Thanks for the heads up.


The RFL seem to think that a name change from the ‘National Leagues’ to the 'Championships’ would somehow revitalize them. But, of course, I didn’t just point out the name change alone, did I?



If it makes no difference, why do it?

Usually, it is to make it look like something is being done when really it isn’t. That is why it is nothing more than a gimmick. Gimmicks solve nothing.


I haven’t ranted about anything, Chief. Oh… I forgot… you are one of those people who regards anyone that has a different opinion to you must be ranting.

I thought that I was merely discussing issues that affect the lower leagues in a reasonable way, making nothing but suggestions and demanding nothing. Whether I am right or wrong, is up for discussion. Perhaps, the Greeks should just tell EU ministers to stop moaning and ranting and all the problems will just float away?

Pro RL in this country is almost entirely about Super League, compared to how it used to be. Am I wrong in that?


What is my agenda and what makes you think I have that agenda?

Nobody wants to see the sport progress more than me and, if that means the licence system is needed, so be it. I was just looking at ways that might make it a little better for the lower league clubs. Terrible, I know. I’ll go and do some sort of penance immediately.



Why not. As long as they introduce these clubs in a genuinely viable way, while allowing them to develop and grow properly, before thrusting them into SL with a team full of Aussies and little genuine representation from the local area.


They still have work to do with England on that score too. But, to be honest, I couldn’t give a toss where a player comes from, as long as he is legal under international rules.


But, some do come from the lower leagues, or are developed in them after being released from Super League clubs, and then return. Also a lot of players in SL academies come from areas that have lower league clubs. These local lower league pro-clubs are what stimulate interest in the sport in the first place, give impetus to the setting up of local amateur teams, school teams and service areas, that SL clubs benefit from. The lower leagues provide SL clubs and players with many beneficial options, that it otherwise may not have.

They want money for nothing eh?

They didn’t reject the idea of ‘partnerships’, whatever that means, but being nothing more than feeder clubs isn’t likely to be popular with many. That is a different kettle of fish, and using the word partnership is somewhat disingenuous, if you are describing it as a simple partnership.

I was thinking more along the lines of a central RFL fund which makes it cost effective to run academies across the board. That would allow them to fill their clubs with their own homegrown talent, which would save them money. They would then be producing more professional players, than they do now, and that would be good for Super league too.

Despite the fact any money given to lower league clubs would probably have to come from tv money earned by SL clubs, there may be reasons to do it because of the mutual benefit and common good this could provide - or maybe not.


I did not say that the recession was not having an effect, but that it is definitely not the whole story, as you, casually asserted. I said that there has been a steady decline. If you still think, after all that I have written, that I am blaming this decline entirely on the licence system, then you are either not very bright, or you just haven’t read a dammed thing that I have written. You are the one that seems to only want to discuss the issues that the lower leagues are having with the system, not me. I have stated quite clearly, on a number of occasions, that there are many reasons for the problems suffered by these clubs, and even that it all maybe totally unavoidable. It is you who wants to put it all down to one thing (recession). It is you who insists that the licence system is causing no problems for the lower leagues and has even solved the boom and bust promotion race. I feel completely vindicated in countering those ridiculous assertions.



I am not arguing against any change. I am simply pointing out the consequences of those changes and the position that they put the lower league clubs in. I am not trying to put back the clock, or stop progress. These are just your assumptions, which is why you are completely misunderstanding my position.


I’m not trying to find any negatives – there are negatives for some though, even if you refuse to see them. Everything isn’t positive. There is no form of human existence where it is. That is why grown ups discuss the negative issues, in a reasonable and adult fashion, and try to come up with solutions. They make points, some of which may seem controversial, particularly to people who have already taken a hard-line stance against a proposition and refuse acknowledge it. You are one of these people. That is why you just write it off as moaning.



I hold my hands up to that one. I had no idea there was 14,000 Wembley Club members. I’m not sure of your logic when you try to assert that it means everything I say, and every assumption that I make must be wrong. We all make assumptions, we have to because we don’t know everything, and sometimes you are right and sometimes not. Not every assertion I have made is an assumption anyway. In fact, most aren't. I have always had to good grace to admit I am wrong. I suspect that you are not the same. I find your triumphalism here laughable. The Challenge cup still isn't what it once was as attendances are still relatively poor outside of the final. So my point still stands.

Pro-RL in this country is almost entirely identified with the Super League competition and brand.

For good or bad, that is the position, imo.