Half the time I end up turning the sound off during the game.

Eddie's 'commentating' is awful. A commentator should tell us the name of the person with the ball/making the play, inform us of interchanges, inform us of any players switching positions and throw in some facts & figures. Eddie forgets players names, try's to throw in his own opinions/analysis and comes accross bias towards the top teams.

Stevo's job should be to provide expert summary and in-game analysis. He should explain why teams have done something, explain certain rules and their outcome. He shouldn't be telling teams what to do ('go for the 1-pointer', h'e's got to get the message out' etc.), he should be there to explain the game from an experts perspective and point out the subtle changes in tactics/errors and rules. He's a joke.

Please don't have a live audience.

It will effectively kill off any interest in the sport anywhere further south than Warrington.

Friday night game, Saturday night double header, Sunday night game

get rid of that pillock Stevo

Allow Clarke a maximum of 10 mentions of 'Wigan' and only when it refers to matches involving Wigan, no more of:

Hemmings: 'how well did you think Cats and Hull played in the first half, Phil'

Clarke: 'well, if you look at Wigans game last night'

the general feeling seems to be that we could do with something like The Footy Show or Soccor AM. i think that could be great people do enjoy that sort of thing, i know many people who have absolutely no interest in girlieball but are still avid watchers of soccor AM. the same is true of the NRL and The Footy Show.

Get Rabbits Warren and Peter Sterling doing the commentary. Otherwise Sky, imo, cover RL brilliantly. You've got to remember the bad old days when RL got hardly any coverage at all and without Sky would in all probability, be a completely amateur game.