No, not really. Since they're being shared with Ukraine, there are only 4 Euro stadiums in Poland. That leaves 15 stadiums being constructed/redeveloped by councils. Either way you look at it, it trumps SL by some margin.

Would you prefer to watch the game from the existing South stand then?

Incidentally how many of these clubs own the grounds.
A rugby clubs only real asset is it's home, and sadly many have cashed in to become tenants.
I'm not saying that's wrong, perhaps in modern RL there is no need to own your home, but I do think it's a little sad.

It's not sad , it's potentially disastrous , you cannot run a pro,semi pro RL team on one revenue stream ( fans through the turnstiles ) , so any club not owning/running their own stadium has real problems , I include the likes of Huddersfield , Hull , Salford , Widnes in this as well as the Championship clubs

I would suggest this is the reason Cas are so against sharing a council stadium and are doing all they can to actually fund and build their own , as that is the only way they will ever be in position to challenge the big teams

Salfords stadium is being built with footings in place for another 2 phases of building. Both phases will have an affect on the 3 smaller stands and corners if/when attendances improve. Once the club can show a need for increasing the capacity the next phase will be built. Phase 3 will take the ground to a 20-22,000 capacity.

If you go onto the turkey there are photo's available of the different phases

It is great that new stadia are being built & that may encourage a renewed interest at some clubs & us fans get a bit more comfort. But will it actualy improve the game or its finances? As by chance I am watching Manly playing the Cowboys from Brookvale oval it is pouring with rain A large number of the crowd are in the open & stood on a grass bank down the far touch line, The league we all seem to be trying to emulate dont seem to think that grounds are the most important thing in selling the game & that ground makes Bell view look palatial. Also how many fans on here actualy would prefer to stand but cant as they are in all seater stadiums. I am lucky that HKR are developing slowly & we have the East stand to watch from & as far as I know the new North stand will be seated but the planed east stand extension & eventualy the south stand (after the tempory stand is replaced) will be standing, I am happy with that.

That is just simply not true - from either clubs perspectives.

One is awaiting the outcome of a PI to be heard in December, with results due next spring, subject to that the stadium WILL proceed as the first phase of a significant business development.

One is awaiting outline planning for a retail development which would unlock the funding to allow the development to proceed on a site already granted PP for the stadium.

There are different challenges and varying timescales involved, but neither are inter-related and both can stand alone on their own merits - with, importantly, the support of their customers, i.e. us!

Out of these "new" stadiums how many are or will be soley owned independantly by the rugby league club concerned and can financially considered as a club asset.

Cas.

Correct, apart from the multiple charges on it, cas do own WR.

Before you go off on one you should read his post again. He said NEW grounds.

PS: You should do some research before making such comments as well (and not always believe ill-informed peers on the Wakey forum).