lets get this back on subject, im a league fan not that worried about other sports have or dont have!
if wellington cant get the ball rolling for a 2nd nz side then how about christchurch maybe frank endacott, the crl, local council, local league suppouters in canterbury nz, and local bussinesses could get a bid rolling for themselves. using upcoming warriors came and 4 nations test later in the year to demostrate thier case, make up a few banners have people in crowd waving them and bang its on tv and youve got some instant publicity for a chch nrl sides bid!
6679_1399761959.png[quote="dally messenger":1gysl9ow]was watching an nfl doco. on one of their teams and they used the term bomb to describe those long high passes from quaterback to running back and i think gibson took that idea, realized you cant throw the ball forward in RL and adapted it to a "bomb" kick we have[/quote:1gysl9ow]
[quote="eels fan":1gysl9ow]You poor poor obsessed fat ex vichyballin potato thieving stoaway.[/quote:1gysl9ow]:d7dc4b20b2c2dd7b76ac6eac29d5604e_6679.png
Quote: The AUP "2.1. Comments that are wholly designed to upset or cause distress to other members are prohibited on this site.
* We will not tolerate threatening or abusive behaviour. Anyone who is found guilty of acting this way towards any member risks being banned from RLFANS.'"
This is getting boring.
Everyone concernedwill lose their posting privileges.
All views expressed are those of the author and not necessarily those of the RLFANS.COM or its subsites.
Whilst every effort is made to ensure that news stories, articles and images are correct, we cannot be held responsible for errors. However, if you feel any material on this website is copyrighted or incorrect in any way please contact us using the link at the top of the page so we can remove it or negotiate copyright permission.
RLFANS.COM, the owners of this website, is not responsible for the content of its sub-sites or posts, please email the author of this sub-site or post if you feel you find an article offensive or of a choice nature that you disagree with.
