Never been to Bramall Lane so looking forward to my visit.

Better stadium and good for the fans, not sure it helps the Eagles though, they still dont have their own stadium and their finances are partly in the hands of a rival sport. This doesnt strengthen their super league prospects for me unless the Blades have given them a 20 year guarantee on a minimal rent.....which I doubt they have somehow.

Sharing with football clubs and not having their own staidum killed the Broncos, it's not the way forward imo. At least the DVS was council owned (?) and the Eagles had some security there.

What ever your opinion is off me is irrelevant. I have a valid point and don't like it.

If you don't like it..why make it?



As the owners of the Eagles (Thompson/Adams etc) wanted the merger there was consent so no 'rape'

occured.

Somehow I think other SL clubs will be relegated before the Giants.

The eagles are a VERY well run club with NO overdraught or debts, how many other clubs can say that, they could get respectable crowds and Bramall Lane meets the required standards ok, so why not Eagles for SL?

I think the main gripe for people is the crowds they get. Little over a thousand, which would probably translate to Salford-sized crowds in SL at best. If they can get them up to about 2,000 in CC then it might give them a better standing.

Could swap em for Salford and get a better run club with a better stadium then

I'm kinda liking Salford at the moment.


I like that we have a team based in an area where you can film a series based in 1973 and not need to use movie props to get the effect.

Or you could swap them for an even better club?