The facts are that it doesn't matter who were favourites that doesn't win you the trophy. But as you said...



You could always actually discuss the matter of the thread whenever you choose to of course.

That is true, and no-one has said that isn't the case. But the fact is that Leeds didn't walk the title, and to claim so is ridiculous!


Well I do believe it was you who got your knickers in a twist about my original post in relation to the discussion, so I will start back there:

I don't think Hull will finish top two. I'm not sure about where Leeds will finish, as they will no doubt bottle it again mid-season.

(And I hope you realise that all of this is in relation to the TABLE, not the play-offs).

So why try and raise the bookies favourite as an issue? Dolt.

If it takes taking the foot off the gas mid-season the walk the GF again I will be more than happy.

As for FC, third isn't unobtainable...

Lower than fifith will require the injury excuse again.

Because it was an indication of how much you "walked" the season. So much so that you weren't even favourites to win it. If you'd walked the season, you'd have (unless something bad happened the week before) been the favourites.


So would I, but it lost you the CC and the LLS though. Sooner or later you might wanna be more ambitious and do more than winning the GF from 2nd!



Well we have lost our first choice FB, one of our first choice wingers and centres, one of our impact props hasn't arrived yet and our star signing hasn't even got a visa yet. Just imagine how good we'll be if we get all these in the same squad.
They may not be as significant losses in key positions as losing Toopi and Lauitiiti, but at least it hasn't cost us top-spot yet!

I love debating SL championships with Gateshead fans and their vast experience of winning them.



Nice to see they have a stock of excuses for flopping again and it's only March.

It's funny, because for someone who has constantly accused people of not being able to read his posts (even though they read correctly), you are struggling to read others. I'm pretty sure I am discussing league positions, and not SL championships.

Not that it matters how many times the club you or I support has won the SL in whether we can discuss it or not. It's not like supporting a club that has won the SL puts you in any better a position than me to discuss it, does it? And if so, please explain as I would love to hear it!



Oh, and Gateshead... original (and desperate)

I agree it is highly likely that Gateshead/FC (sorry you don't like it but I've been in contact with Companies House) will end up higher than the disappointing second from bottom this year.

As for when they lose, as is the issue of this thread, we don't know. They may pull off wins against the better teams like Leeds, Saints and KR, they may lose to less strong like cas and wire.

You're trying to sound smart and coming off extremely badly. Well done.

Tell me, is it the company that score points on the pitch, or the team? And what is the team called? Infact, what is the company called? 'Cos it aint Gateshead/FC



Still waiting for this answer on how you supporting Leeds and me supporting Hull makes any difference as to discussing the SL championship!

Personally I thought it would be more polite to discuss the issue of the thread. I've given my opinion regarding this as you will see from my last post.

As an aside would you like to tell us all what the mish-mash club is actually legally called?

And the award for the most blantant trolling attempt in RLfans history goes to....