Don't worry about it.If,as stated above,clubs were NOT warned that stadium criteria was important for Super League Licensing,it surely can't be applied now where so many clubs use stadia owned by other sports.
You do have an 'elite' Academy,which also had a bearing all those years ago.
M62 clubs could learn so much from overseas clubs.
Much to the chagrin of Donnyman...

** OH,and eluded means something completely different from ALLUDED **

Just taken a look at Moor Lane and it's more than adequate for Salfords needs. Nothing wrong with it and it certainly looks possible to increase its capacity in the future. We need to be realistic, it's fine even for SL, certainly way better than Trailfinders.

It's called sarcasm Vasty but obviously wasted on you.

Are we not solvent? We haven't paid the full rent for the stadium however that isn't debt hanging over our heads. It's just not been asked for AFAIK.

Salford remain solvent only as long as someone keeps deciding not to call their debt in.

Where have you "taken a look" Vasty? Google Earth? Google Maps Street View? An LS Lowry painting?



From someone brought up round the corner who has played at the ground and has stood on the terraces there for a number of years I can categorically state it doesn't have any extra surrounding land to expand the current stadium (the large expanse of land over Moor Lane is a nature reserve and protected land). There are barely enough parking spaces to accommodate players vehicles but apparently parking for fans isn't a SL requirement so it's fine on that front.

Having had a quick look at all SL requirements it does look as though it meets them (bar the 3m run off area at each side of the pitch).

The original Licensing required 12k minimum capacity.

To be fair, put some bleachers up in peel park and Salford will sell out

Crawl back under your stone you pathetic little troll.

Looks like this has run it's course.