because we havent gone from 14 to 12. London and Bradford stayed full time, leigh joined them. So we went from 14 to 15 and a few who were playing at it.

But that full time element is by no means certain for the future is it ?
Bradford may go part time and London, who knows.

Either way, the top flight is 2 clubs light (4 if you compare back to the old first division), which necessarily shrinks both the talent pool and the opportunity for young players who may want a career in RL.

My poit was that far from increasing intensity in the top flight, the new structure has diminished it, unless you count the games in the Qualifiers ??

And im agreeing with you. Im saying that shrinking the top flight from 14 to 12 should have seen the best players of the two worst clubs distributed amongst the others. Concentrating the talent. It didnt because those two stayed full time, leigh joined them and others could offer more to more players. We have expanded the number of clubs taking from the player pool and not increased the player pool.

Premiership rugby union make an announcement that they are actually going to freeze their salary cap for a couple of years, at £7m. Would be amazed to see us unfreeze ours.

They bring in the sponsorship and tv money by allowing the big teams to spend money and attract the stars. The smaller teams (Sale being one of those) have managed to attract big new sponsors and owners due to being in that league.

Polar opposite of Rugby League where we constrain our clubs (and by god don't the clubs want it. Wouldnt you rather pay your employees less if you ran a business?!?!?!?!) and drag the whole competition level into the gutter. Many of the casual viewers I knew have stopped going to games and watching on tv. What hope to we have of attracting sponsors if these sorts of fans walk away.