Oh, please let's have an end to all this and get back to some rugby..

Omar Khan Vs Andrew Calvert.

This is going to get very nasty and I actually sympathise with both parties. The combined actions in the 12 months prior to administration of the RFL and Lord Peter of Hood have virtually made the club un-rescue-able (sp).

I can't recall any poster specifically 'defending'. A number have tried unsuccessfully it must be said to add context, or point out some of the basic realities associated with purchasing a club that had been catastrophically mis-managed for years. Some of us have some (limited in my own case) experience of trying to keep a ship afloat with precious limited resources and overwhelming responsibilities, and whilst lacking inside information or access to accounts, have some sympathy for a task which looked impossible and has proven to be so.

For your part, you have routinely responded in the manner of a four year old.

I supported Omar. Was I wrong? Don't know yet it'll all come out in the wash.

I'll support the new lot too though because it's what I have to do.

Who cares whether I'm right or not and who cares whether you are?

You obviously but does anyone else care.

What I will say though is I won't be eating at Omar khan's restaurants any time soon.

So Omar did put money in then? And he wants it back? Seems fair enough.

So you think the new board are on the wrong now? I can't keep up with your stance from one day to the next.

Fair comment Mr M - but you'll never beat the knee-jerkers.

Is this the new politically correct name for ......s??

I thought mystic Eddie was anti Omar and liked the new board?

Confused

Do you even know what you write any more?

It is reported that a statutory demand has been served to require repayment of money to OK. It is said he pu £1m into the club. Now, making allowances for sloppy reporting possibilities, it still states clearly that the Stat demand is by OK. Not OK Bulls. (Which is the current trading company and obviously couldn't serve a stat demand on itself) It also states that some sort of a deal was done when OK left and RW remained as to repayments.

If it is true that OK did put a large amount of money in and there was agreement as to repayment, then it would be an odd thing for the sort of shyster and conman you claim him to be to have done, wouldn't it? Of course, it is possible that a statutory demand is being issued over a mythical amount and in fact based on a pure lie and nothing was put in at all. That would be odd. Do you have any firm information in your detailed annals and documentation?

If, theoretically, he was owed a lot of money and if, theoretically, somebody was reneging on an agreement as to repayment, what wouldyou say would need defending about trying to seek repayment by law?

I don't therefore see where this question of "defending" arises. Either the above is the case, or it is not. Time will doubtless tell.

Ross Heppenstall @rosshtanda
Just spoken to Omar's representatives, who stressed he is NOT taking legal action against the Bulls but two individuals M Moore & R Whitcut

V interesting. Suggests Watt and Calvert have paid??

Interesting relationship between Omar and Ryan these days then!

So it all suggests that Omar did actually put money in then. Any comment ME?

Agreement between OK and whitcut/Moore was before watt and Calvert came on board wasn't it?. Wonder what happens if Moore leaves club too. Does it then become a personal debt owed by whitcut/Moore to OK and no longer an issue for club.

Do we have any idea how Omar put the money in becuase surely he would have to be the one to give the goahead (which seems unethical if he knew he was going to go)? Did he have a meeting with his reflection where he agreed the interest rate, repayment terms and penalties for non\late payment with his stooge Whitcut there to make it seem above board or were others involved?