Him as well? Good god I'm well shut of her.

Put all the half truths together and in the middle you will see a hole. That hole is exactly the same size and shape as the lie you are being told.

Whether his name is Simon or Fantastic Mr isn't the story. The story is more about who told you and why?

Mick, you're embarrassing yourself again.

MB may not "definitely know" or otherwise whom I may be, but I do. And, apologies for bursting yet another of your bubbles, but I am not the aforementioned. You do seem to be a little obsessed may I point out. Perhaps you should focus more on the points I was making about the current predicament and the logical standpoint of maintaining a positive nature regarding the review and not on your attempts at grandstanding on behalf of others.

I am alternatively, any one of: George Galloway, Keith Senior, Richie Spedding, Chris Caisley, Red Rum, Jimmy Hoffa, Peter Hood, JFK, Stuart Duffy, Hulk Hogan and Lord Lucan.

I will ignore your ongoing (and incorrect) obsession with whom I may be as comical as it is, but by all means refer to me as whomever you wish if it continues your obsession and whatever inaccuracy somebody is feeding you to relay. Weeks ago you were also categorical in your assumption I was Caisley himself. I applaud your ability to blow with the latest wind

I don't read your Twitter feed (I'd be unsure of the reality of any names for a start) however I would fully expect the current review team and CC himself to be holding multiple conversations with both personal and commercial investors. That being in return for some form of sponsorship would have complete validity.

At no point have I believed that the current review team are actively looking to place it in administration, or indeed, have that as their de facto outcome. To hold that standpoint is both incredibly negative, lacking objectivity and doing nothing to aid the current predicament. That has been my constant all along to the chagrin of a couple of folks who are determined they are personally privy to the obviously pre-ordained outcome.

Yes, the silence is deafening from the review, but then I would expect nothing less and realistically, I'm more than happy to await the final assessment.

Comedy Gold!

Wait until the review is complete but in the meantime Whitehead & Bateman start talks with Warrington. I wonder what the review will conclude.

Surely they're talking to lots of clubs? You're not going to get the best deal just talking to the one......?

Does anybody have an idea when the club will be announcing the findings from the review getting very bored of waiting

But why talk to clubs when no-one apparently knows the state of the finances until after the review?

I've no idea TT. Who was it said "Wait until the review is complete [ibut in the meantime Whitehead & Bateman start talks with Warrington"[/i?, maybe we should have a word with him?

what happened to his promise of investors ready to put in as soon as hood and bennet out?caisley is a lying toad and mentioning he is now looking for investment fills me with little confidence as this is something he claimed was already in place.