Quote: HamsterChops "That was what I originally thought, but if he is on a loan deal, how could he have been on the bench for Cas and then turn out for Batley 3 days later? If it's loan, he couldn't do that, whether he was used or not. I think perhaps it was worded as a loan when announced, but is in reality dual reg.'" www.pontefractandcastlefordexpre ... -1-8366506

Quote: HamsterChops "That was what I originally thought, but if he is on a loan deal, how could he have been on the bench for Cas and then turn out for Batley 3 days later? If it's loan, he couldn't do that, whether he was used or not. I think perhaps it was worded as a loan when announced, but is in reality dual reg.'" www.pontefractandcastlefordexpre ... -1-8366506

Not like dual reg to cause confusion and controversy. Farce of a system.

Had a nosey at the rules earlier in season when it looked like we might need dual reg and it said it is designed to help develop young players who might not be ready for first team. funnt how ageing aussie Brett Delaney turned out for Fev other week.

Fake news. Sad

So Lilley didn't play? So have Leeds just recalled him to be y?

No! He was there to show the 1st Team Players what would happen to them if they played that badly again! Worked well this time!

Do you really believe Leeds would loan us 4 players to help us out and then be "y" to us......Really!

Does this mean he is available for us then? See all the usuals on banter page on fb saying no bujt if Maher was on the bench for cas and didnt play surely he can? I would be pretty sure Maher wasnt in batleys 19 man squad submitted to the RFL for last weeks game

Bartley and Cas are DR that's the difference

Maher was in Batley's 19 last week.


Seriously folks. As I've said elsewhere, unless a new loan agreement comes in, with the month minimum as standard, he won't be playing. We are NOT in Dual Reg with Leeds. Castleford are with Batley. Learn the difference between loan and dual reg.

Thought all 4 Leeds lads are now on weekly loans?

Lilley was recalled last week as he was used by Leeds against Cas. They can't recall him without terminating the loan deal.
By terminating it, for him to turn out on loan again for Bradford, it would need a new deal, which would come with the standard of one month minimum where Leeds couldn't recall him. That's the way loans work.

Would someone like me to explain this in a new thread so it can be stickied?

It's time to move on from Jordan Lilley. It was good whilst it lasted, but surely none of us thought it was going to last forever?

I'm not a moron, I do know the difference no need to be patronising as some of your posts are when you are shooting down other peoples posts. If Lilley was going to be 19th man there was nothing stopping the clubs sorting something by the deadline yesterday

Except he couldn't be recalled for a month. And Leeds' squad is a bit stretched. And Easter is coming up