Give it up. Even if he were a few inches offside surely we should have been able to catch him in 79 metres. Our backs couldn't score from 79 metres.

Did you see our last try?

Yes. They chased our quickest back down and a speculative inside pass was collected by Jeffries. Their try was a forward that outrun our speedsters for 80, sorry 79 metres.

I'd back any of our backs to score from an intercepted pass 80m out with the opposing fullback up in the line of attack.

With the exception of Deacon obviously

Widders' back foot made the line, but his front foot got nowehere near. And we all know what the mantra is this year, don't we children? "BOTH FEET, BOTH FEET".

That was so last year...

No, the mantra liveth on

Do you not have eyes?
No he wasn't. FACT.

Yeah I have eyes.

Yes he was FACT

If he was offside referee would have given a penalty DID HE? NO FACT!!!

DID SCORE COUNT? YES FACT

your opinion was he was offside the facts show that the try was given and no pentaly awared to you that he was onside!!! FACT

No fact? Don't start agreeing with us now, you can't change your argument half-way through.

The only fact in there are the fact that the try was given because the referee didn't see the offside.

The rest is purely your opinion. FACT.

He was offside, it's pretty clear for even those with one blinkered eye to see. But don't let FACTs get in the way of your ranting.

the defence was nothing short of awful but one positive was Halley who was outstanding if it wasn't for him we would have lost by a lot more