Quote: Bulliac "Don't think the RFL would be happy.
If we don't play the majority of our home games at the ground one of the major tenets of the primary lease from the council would be broken and the RFL would presumably lose the lease they paid us for [or didn't pay us for, depending on who you believe..] In that situation the lease reverts back to the council.'"
So, what you're saying is if we had someone on the council in our corner we could get out of the deal with the RFL then get the lease back?
If we were willing to go down a questionable route, that is