Without knowing all the ins and outs it's difficult to comment but it's disappointing if he has gone, especially given out lack of options up front.

I wouldn't be surprised to see us sign someone like Keith Mason.

Unsure about this. He does have good potential but isn't going to be ready for SL for at least another year. We've obviously offered a contract based on potential but he believes he is worth more. We'll have to see how he develops to see whether this is a good deal or not.

what about the ones i have got right, cant get them all right, but i think i might be on this one

While it's disappointing it shows the position we are in. We can't enter bidding wars with clubs such as Leeds for players who gave never played a game of SL. We can only really do that with players we know are going to make it such as Bateman, O'Brien etc

OK. My son works with a guy who is involved in the Academy set up at Leeds

He told my lad a couple of weeks ago that a) McAvoy was originally wanted by Leeds before he signed for us, b) was still wanted to Leeds and c) was apparently not happy last season at the Bulls i.e lack of first grade opportunity.

I didn't take this all that seriously at the time, but this news puts all this into perspective. I realise you could say I'm making this up (although I hope my posting history on here shows that I don't do that) but I assure you that this was what I've been told.

Assuming its true, then it would seem that Leeds were prepared to offer him a package based on their view of his potential. Equally I assume that FC didn't share that view. Time will tell which was correct....

He must be pretty dumb to leave us now if it's game time he wants. Moving from a club desperate for props, to join another club whos coach seems completely reluctant to alter his starting 17. It makes no sense, he was practically guaranteed some first team action with us.

I agree y leave if you want game time no offence to the lad but he want be getting any this year at Leeds

Suppose you can't.

Hope this one isn't, although it looks likely now

I mean he will but will be same as ambler and amor young props just dont seem to work at leeds. Could swap him for richard more seen as we are due a small fee? ha

It's all a bit of fun on here mate!

And yeah, disappointing but considering we've managed to keep hold of Bateman, Elliot, Donno etc then think we can still feel lucky.

Mason or Sidlow? Who would we rather have?

Neither as good as Nas in my opinion.

fair play to liam if hes taken a chance and gone to rhinos, he may suprise a few and take his chance well.
he wasnt ready last seadom..is he ready now? who knows.

bullscharge we still have nas so its ok they dont need to be the same.

With what we have I think both offer different aspects - sidlow more all action have liked him for a few years and cant understand why he has been out of squad so much, decent hands for a prop,not a bad offload, size and some aggression. Not a world beater but as steady as well get at this stage - Mason a perma tan and a lot of agression,, mongrel in the pack type.
Stats wise one played 16 games and one played 17 - otherwise pretty even sidlow has higher busts, offloads and less penalties whilst about 80 meters more in one game more for mason. When comparing them sidlow (25) has 6 years on mason (31) and has not played in Oz or have a mega ego so would guess sidlow would be cheaper option.
Id take sidlow but realise we do not have a mongrel or enforcer but would prefer to lose this in favour of a more skilled individual been signed.

Sidlow, because of age and value.

Would like Mason bu would be more of a luxury.