Even paranoids have enemies


Edit. Viola!

Although I can delete the whole thing if I want to as long as no-one else has used it

Smells a bit Joynts Voluntary Tackle in here.

The thing is though Bonzo is that I am not paranoid. It was clearly there as has been seen elsewhere and I am just keen to know why it was changed that is all.

After all, if someone had been abusing their "priviledges" then surely they should have such priviledges withdrawn?

It was changed. It is hard to believe that someone went to all the effort to change it. For what purpose?
I can only see one purpose really.

To conceal the fact that Hitler escaped to Argentina. Yes I see now.

Are you trying to prove them right?

Seriously though, the full quote means that even if you were wrong about persecution in the past - doesn't mean you are wrong now. I'll leave you to your own devices now

I was right in the past about it and prove the point and I am right again now.

And by the same person who is the only mod on here to have a pop rather than deny any responsibility. You would think they would learn.

Some of us don't have the luxury of being able to use public internet access whilst at work ME and, as you'll have seen from the timing of my posts, I work late . . . hence why I've not commented since my earlier, [iapparently[/i, "pop " - which, FYI, it wasn't. As ever, don't let an inconvenient truth get in the way of a little twist, hey.

That post was in relation to the last time you went off on one on here, for nigh on two weeks, about what I'd said on a private mod board after you'd gained access to that private information; subsequently chose to ignore all of the PM conversations ([iI still have them, and the others, you've sent by the way [/i ) we subsequently had on how we'd [ijointly [/iagreed we'd deal with that -[i which you reneged, might I remind you[/i - and then your subsequent public "I'm sorry" thread.

You're wrong ME, I have learned.

I've learned not to get drawn into your little games of innuendo, which is the real reason I haven't commented and, quite simply, won't be playing this time, matey; I have no desire for you to end up looking silly, again.

Hope that clarifies it simplistically enough for you and without the slightest bit of ambiguity . . . . though I'm sure you'll find some

Bullpower, I really worry about him. And there are several on here that know I are really worried about him, cos I discussed this with them ftf the other night so they can attest to that. I don't think exposing his problems on here is helping him at all, I now realise

The question still remains however - who changed the posts. On this thread and on the OSV thread, where one of Adey's was changed.
I feel that someone should own up and explain. I'm sure one of the mods must know who it is.

Any chance we could get back to debating Bradford Bulls and rugby league on these forums?

I'm sick of reading people's personal arguments played out on the boards. It's derailing debate and cluttering the threads.

Can't you all wipe the slate clean and start again?

Someones just changed bulls on fire's post it actually read as below. It's beyond the joke now.

You Sir are a legend!