Agreed. I have looked at the pictures from Oldham and my shirt and the V is different and also not as bright.

Still like it though.

Had a look last night and the away shirt looks nothing at all like the promo pictures that we were led to believe we were buying; think there will be a few annoyed fans and children.

Can someone post a pic?

Colours are slightly darker on the supporters version. Collar is also different to the players version.

Cheers. They are pretty different.
Still looks smart though.
How much are they?

I've now seen clearer pictures on Facebook.

The collars I can forgive. They're often different on playing and replica shirts.

But the colour? The smart looking silver is gone and it's essentially just a slightly lighter shade of black forming the V. (Well, incredibly dark gray, since you can't really have "light black"icon_wink.gif. Certainly different enough that it looks very much like a rip off.

Bulls have now put out a statement claiming that the original shirts in all the pictures and the ones played in at Oldham weren't actually the correct shirt....



The website bloke still can't spell "original" though (although the spell checker has since corrected it)...

God, we are like a bad comedy sketch.

That statement looks like it's been written by someone whose first language isn't English. We seem to be going from bad to worse. Not only a massive cock up over the away shirts, the statement on the website doesn't even make sense....



What does that even mean?

I know we are playing 'catch up', but it's time we started getting these little things right!

It's worrying that we can't seem to find someone to even write and proof read a simple spell press release properly. Again, how hard can that be? 99% of people on here could do a better job.

Spelling "original" with an extra O doesn't even need a proof read. It needs a basic spell checker which a lot of internet browsers would do for you even if you don't own a license for Word Processing software. Somehow that even managed to pass the first "release". Surely you run that before you press "Submit" on the website editor?

I can understand people moaning about the slight contrast between what the players are wearing and what is being sold to the supporters. But let's be honest, people will buy it regardless if it's black, silver, pink or poop stained brown.

People need to get out more if they're complaining about the kit. Just remember, we didn't have a club to support 5 months ago. The new owners are doing their best. Judging from that poorly written statement the squad will now be wearing the newer, more darker away jersey.

Also, can we please address the issue with these press releases. It's beyond a joke now.

I disagree. What you're saying there is along the lines of what a few people on facebook have been saying. The "Be happy you have a club to support and don't complain when they rip you off. Just give them your money and stop moaning" approach isn't one I subscribe to. They still need to make things value for money, and offering substandard merchandise (i.e. something that isn't as advertised) is not a way to please customers and encourage people to spend their hard earned.

Whoever does the match reports also has problems with his/her spellchecker. I assume it's set to English (USA) as it seems to spell defence with an 's'. Personally, I view American spellings as being on a par with pidgin. Fair enough, absolutely anyone can make a typo but it takes a spellchecker to get it wrong twice in the same report.