You imagine wrong. the RFL cannot, and will not, become an employer otherwise it would be in a TUPE position plus would have to deduct tax, NI and all the rest. Wages will be paid via the business, which the administrator is running.


Players have not gone "to cover the outgoings", if you think we have been trousering large transfer fees you are simply wrong. Players have gone because those players judged it in their personal best interests.

and to reduce running costs surely?

Facts have been a financial scarcity for a number of years yet you have been willing to believe them.
Now people are challenging that in light of some pretty big evidence (2 admins etc) you get all shirty and demand hard evidence!!
Jeez!!
All i can say is its a shame you weren't genning up on Miss Marple paperbacks back then, maybe you could have been some use to the club!!

the club is worth more as a going concern, the administrator can only run the club if he has funds. So the central funds that are due to Bradford are given to the administrator along with all revenue generated from games. Suppliers of services and refreshments etc etc will want paying up front before they offer their services if the money runs out before the club is bought that is when it gets really ugly (and it's bad enough now for the supporters and those who work for Bradford....you would not wish this scenario on your worst enemy)

Hope someone steps forward asap to take over.

Hmm nice editing to suit. Anyway...

First hence the words 'in effect'. The RFL witheld general distribution of sky monies, only transferring an amount over to the adminsistrator to cover the wages. This was done and passed on to the staff within the same day. An exact amount in and out within a matter of hours carried out on two occaisions.

Secondly you have received transfer fees which will go/have gone towards running costs, whether they are 'massive' or not is irrelevent. This also has the effect of cutting down the upcoming wage bill. Yes the players couldn't be forced to leave and have gone because it is in their and their families best interests. But the fact remains that the administrator needs funds to run ther business whilst a buyer is found and the more he can raise and the less it costs to keep the business ticking over as a going concern the better. Hence if he deems it necessary he will sell players to raise whatever funds he can from the sale and cut the running cost by shedding their wage until he can cut no further.

You tend to find when employees are upset, worried, angry they tend to talk quite openly about the situation and seek out advice. And right now and understandably the Bulls have some staff that fit all those descriptions.

Is that your proof?

So shall we all agree you have no proof

But don't worry,it sounds good which is all that matters

No skin off my nose pal, if it makes you happy you believe whatever you like i'll leave you to your little world. I'm sure you can satisfy yourself with your proof that it didn't happen.

Good luck to you, i fear your going to need it.

Zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

Yeah you do he's wrong that's usuaully a good reason to doubt someone.



I don't believe it no.

I didn't edit anything to suit, the words you used were
which they didn't. Second, it couldn't have been an exact amount in and out, as the amount paid out would be net of tax and NI deductions. But anyway we now know what you meant.


Yes, yes, if we got £1 for Scruton that £ goes towards running costs, and if that makes it "relevant" to you, sure, dead right.


Yes they could, the administrator is not bound to keep anyone on. It would just be harder to run a RL club as a going concern if he let all the players go.

[roger daly mode on] can you prove he is wrong? [roger daly mode off]

I wish some of those who post on here could run the club - with their vast knowledge of what is going on they would prove invaluable. Well, in effect they would prove invaluable..

I love you

Thanks...but I'm spoken for!