Tomkins saw a size 11 at very close quarters.

The Senior one to me, they kind of got the verdict correct, but the punishment wrong.

It's a problem I've noticed for a while now (Burrow is terrible for it) when players thrash about on the floor and swing their legs around. They said about Senior that it was accidental and he didn't intend to kick someone in the head. Well, that's correct, I'm sure he didn't intend on kicking him in the head. But that doesn't take away from the fact that throwing your legs up in the air like that is dangerous. The accident was the contact, it wasn't the flailing.

I've said for a while that someone's gonna get a boot in the face one day and then it happened this weekend. While I appreciate he didn't mean to do it, it's almost like throwing a punch and intending to stop your first right in front of someone's face to scare them. If you accidentally misjudge it and smack them one, while you didn't intend to do it, you shouldn't have been throwing your first there in the first place!

bit like saying the refs should be consistent in their interpretation of rules and we still different interpratations each week depending on individual ref appointed.

Any one on here eating humble pie?
Thought it was only Leeds who got away with suspensions.
Clear case of a one game ban for Sykes if ever there was one and low and behold he gets it rescinded.
Webb gets 2 games appeals and gets to keep the 2 even though he should not have been banned in the first place.
Typical Bradford cheating the system.
Must have Redhall in their pockets.
Cheats.

Not this week with Senior being let off. Try again later.

Nothing deliberate in what Senior did especially with a player covering his face at the time.
You must admit Sykes deserved a ban.

Very poor trolling. Go talk to Wilks, he's far better at it than you.

Beggar sussed again.
Ewwen and Adey come on give us a break.
Get Bulls 2010 or a guest appearance from Sir Steve Menzies or Mr Gledhill
Maybe tomorrow hey?
Enjoy your weekend even with Sykes playing.

I saw numerous examples of this practice during the 2 televised games this weekend. In fact I would say it is almost physically impossible to swiftly get up off your back without rolling over or using your legs for momentum. I don't think there will be many fines dished out.

Whilst I too saw a number of flailing legs in the televised games this w/e, [iand the following isn't because it was Keith (who regardless of his shirt, is still a class centre IMHO) [/i, I didn't see anything quite as wild / and exaggerated as the incident in question.

I sort of get what you're saying about regaining your feet, but in all honesty don't you reckon it was more about getting the opposition off your legs rather than [iactually [/iregaining your feet? ( I appreciate you can't do one without the other) I don't get your "[imomentum[/i" rule with regards to the flailing legs/boots though

It was a rotten accident, and just that, exacerbated by the strength and vigorous manner in which he kicked out - something, FWIW, I note he didn't do to the same extent this weekend.

Surely that is not the kind of...activity...we should be discussing on a family forum?

I do worry about what goes on out of hours in Ilkley sometimes...

Even more difficult if the one sitting has a pink rinse.

I thought it was blue in Ilkley? And I rest my case...