In the T and A article, it says the players are split into three groups - Top, Middle and the ones who are "slightly behind!". I wonder who is in that bottom group now that Solomona has gone...

Interesting extracts from another excellent article by Mr Murphy:

“You can see they are rebuilding the place and have a long-term plan that I want to be part of.”

"In the past there’s been an obsession with body-building but we want to look at the all-round athlete and get a better picture where their strengths and weaknesses are"

“I’ve been successful in the past in helping to improve fitness and reduce injuries and I’m looking forward to the job ahead."

“If we are patient and look at the long term, I think this club will be healthy. If you look at Leeds now, they’re reaping the rewards of talent development and I think Bradford are headed in the right direction"

Not hard to read the code in that, I suggest?

I like the sound of this Evans guy hopefully his input will bear fruit. To perform in top level sports you need to change with the times and IMO we were adopting a 'me too' approach rather than spotting areas to improve and innovating to make that happen

My only concern is that it appears two people have left and only one has come in by the looks of it.

I was sort of assuming that Medders has had a promotion...official or de-facto is less clear?

Isn't Lee St Hilaire also taking on more responsibility?

Perhaps creating space for a certain player to move onto the coaching staff after this season

the main thing is, we have had major changes, following our miserable season, in the playing roster and now in the coaching staff. Nobody can accuse the club of complacency, not caring, or sitting on its hands.