I guess that's down to the administrator? He announced the liquidation long before New-Co but IIRC he was still trying to sell after it happened with claims and counter claims?

I don't recall the precise dates but liquidation was announced at least a fortnight before it actually happened.

I am personally reconciled to never going again so if this is the end, so be it. Oddly, the Rugby League town I know the most people in outside of Bradford is actually Toronto. I may yet upsticks and feck off. (after St Helens that is, but bugger that)

I remember it being announced then subsequently seeing it hadn't formally happened.

Cha Lo seemed to be the only show in town as far as the RFL was concerned which didn't go down well with the administrator who alleged they'd made unauthorised actions.

All smelt a bit funny at the time.

I wonder if Chisholm is one of the claimants...

All staff were made redundant before Chalow took over this were then employed by the new company who were under no obligation to reemploy them on same terms. They were not TUPED across which would have protected there terms and conditions.

Well according to the article someone's pursuing the newco for something. However I'd have thought it would be Green and the RFL with most to worry about.

Has Green been declared insolvent yet? I did wonder if that was on the cards given everything that happened. If so the claimants will get naff all.

There can't be any trouble ahead for us, the old company was liquidated this is the biggest part of the problems we are facing now trying to get a totally new company in place..

Don't tell the Fax, Hudds or Wakefield followers though it will spoil their gloating.

https://companycheck.co.uk/director/905 ... EN/summary

https://companycheck.co.uk/director/905 ... EN/summary

I cant see there being any issue as a new company but credit where credit is due, The club released a coherent statement about the issue before I personally had even heard about it

it has the smell of their legal advisers providing the statement, having heard how good the usual PR is.

Well the pantomime continues with a new co that emerged from the mess of late last year, with no assets or liabilities as it was established, is being sued. It could only happen in Bradford!!!
Of course it can't happen, people could sue individuals involved, or the RFL, or perhaps the administrator, but by law the new co is safe, unless there is some dark deep secret being kept by Cha/Lo and the RFL.

Given the recent form and lack of communication it at least gives us something else to ponder.

Nah, according to some on twitter, some claiming to be some sort of media guys/students, they think because we play in the same kit, colours, logo that we're accountable. Frightening how people get so confused between COMPANIES and CLUBS.

The article in the guardian mentions that some of the individuals making the claims are being represented by the same solicitor that is dealing with the Cas/Denny Solomona case.
Those muppets on twitter might not realise the difference but I'm pretty sure that solicitor knows what's up.

The only thing I can think of that might drag the newco into this is whether there was any tupe stuff going on between the two companies. We all thought BBN Ltd was liquidated but that doesn't appear to be the case, so who knows.

BBN is liquidated, so unless there is an issue on timing TUPE can't apply.

Given the RFL gave a 2 week deadline to submit bids to form a new company to run a team in Bradford, I'd have expected legal claims to happen in that period for any TUPE claims.