I have quite a lot of experience but I don't recall managing to type with my arms by my side. Perhaps that explains it.

You see anger. Others see discussion. One muppet saw an accusation of booing levelled at his team's supporters when it was a comment made by a Bulls fan at a small section of Bulls supporters.

I see the utter futility of online debate with anybody that has a pre-established opinion.

come on Chissit, try a bit harder, FA is answering you in his sleep, which is rather less entertaining for us than when he makes an effort.

Well thanks for that, it makes things so much clearer now

I thought I was making an observation based on spacial awareness and the amount of people I could see. As it happens, I was apparently making an arrogant statement that our club are the most amazing and successful in history, bring joy into the lives of millions every day, and were instrumental in the Berlin Wall coming down. Or some other b0llocks, I don't know I stopped reading...

I would make an observation about this Chissitt fellow, but I suspect he'd probably think that was something akin to me declaring war on Bolivia.

As far as I'm aware you were only voicing your opinion as to what you perceived a reasonable attendance figure, and for my part I only used your post as a comparison to the special one's post in which he targeted me despite me having no direct or indirect dialogue with him, it would seem matey that you are just a victim of circumstances in all of this, and if I was you I'd forget all about global warming, and the fall of the Berlin wall, trust me none of it was your fault and nobody's blaming you, so my fatherly advice to you is pick your toys' up put them back in the pram and stop feeling sorry for yourself, some things are better not said, so if you feel that making an observation about me might cause a civil war in Bolivia best thing to do is say nowt. Good Luck

In order to get a joke or reference you must be of .80 intelligence or higher.

Is that the best you can do..lol

Thanks for the consideration you have shown in making that comment..Very much appreciated.

[youtubeJNvQezv37xI[/youtube

Go on, then.


No, you said you'd be happy to explain in simpler terms how one of us must be wrong, and we are waiting with bated breath for your explanation. In simpler terms.

I am also struggling a bit with the complexity of this advice, and whilst you're kindly offering to give free English comprehension masterclasses for those of us not blessed with your mastery of expression, could you just help me with a couple of points?

1. Despite me having ribbed you rather obviously about your previous grocer's apostrophe, you s'eem to have s'lipped another one in. This seems unfortunate, for a self-proclaimed master of comprehension, so I assume it has some hidden import that us mere mortals cannot grasp, and not a case of you being barely literate, but could you jus't clear it up for us'?

2. There's an apparent flaw in your chosen metaphor: if Hamster Chops is analagous to an infant in a pram, who has thrown his toys out, then how could said infant reach those toys, in order to be able to pick them up? I mean, it doesn't immediately make sense. Surely, it would be the person looking after the infant who would have the task of toy retrieval and return, as that would be an impossibility for the infant?

That makes part 2 of what you posted irrelevant..But keep the good work up..

I think this thread has run its course now. Thanks for playing.