I think Lee Smith would be a good signing. Play him at fullback, Kearney and Gale at 6 and 7, Sammut off the bench.

You don't need Sammut and Diskin or Stranger on the bench.

Lee smith is a full back without doubt, and if you should sign him then he is a far better option than than owt at your club at present imo

yeah yeah that good. fb may be his best position but he has played wing and centre effectively prior to his sebatacle, not upto it now attitude has gone. IMO no better than what we have. How long since he last played fb anyway?

Better than Kearney at full back? I don't think so.

Well if he cant displace Webb, I think the Bulls would be taking yet another risk.

That is putting it very diplomatically!

I think it'd be a pretty good race between Brett Webb and Paul Deacon. I think Deacs might just edge it!

Webb has gone very much downhill very quickly.

You and others are talking like Webb is pants.

It's a good point

Webb has really declined in the last 12 months - shaky in defence, and less effective chiming into the attack. He's become a very mediocre SL full back. If Lee Smith can't displace him, then it doesn't say much for his full back credentials does it?

The bulls have enquired about the services off Lee.
I thought they may have had a punt a few weeks back but when Kear was signed i assumed that was a no go, but it seems not.
Certainly good cover for the 3 quarters being able to play FB/Wing/Centre and plenty of pace.
Might be a sign walker might be getting pushed into the forwards ?
Thoughts?????

We look a bit light on wingers for 2012 but is that where Lee Smith sees his future?

I hadn't realised he played a full season at centre if the information on wiki is correct. If he could find his form before he went to Union then he would be an improvement on Sykes/Platt.