If Macca had made the signings Potter has, there'd be steam coming out of this forum. The only element that is making it palatable is the constant refrain "we've got to trust Potter". Of the 7 signed, 5 of them are punts.... I'd prefer to have put their salaries together and made one signing. If, so far we'd signed Elima, Hargreaves, L. Pryce, with news of a couple more to come, I'd have been chuffed. At the moment I'm just bemused. I can see why othe Bulls fans are cheesed off and why the top 5 Clubs this season must be confident of finishing above us again next season.

Are they? Or is it just you on a wind-up?

The team clearly needed a number of more experienced bodies. That is what has been signed. We all saw what happened when money went into a marquee player last year, with a very thin squad as a consequence.

And anyway, Bulls have got no God-given right to be in the top 5. Most Bulls fans (fekkwittry excepted) believe making it into the top 5 next year would be a big ask regardless of who we sign, given the major rebuilding.

Fair point that.

The biggest difference for me is that Macca signed "these sort of players" (if you assume they're the same sort) as the first choice for their position and with no backup. Like Sheriffe & Reardon for example who were clearly first choice wingers but didn't really have anyone else pressing them at the time, except for untested youngsters. Potter has signed these players aswell as others to compete for positions.

Every club who plays by the rules has a choice to make. You can either have superstars but no quality backup, or you can have more "average solid" type players in greater numbers, so that if injuries hit, it's not such a big thing.

Potter has clearly chosen the second option. Macca seemed to pick a mixture of the two where he put average players in key positions without backup (with obvious exceptions).

I think that's the main reason why I personally would consider this a better chance of success than Macca's efforts.


Then there's the obvious thing as well that people are giving a new coach a chance before criticising, in the same way you give a player a chance before condemning him. If Macca was still here and signing these players, nobody would have confidence he could bring the best out of them because of a poor track record in that field.

TBF they would probably hold that view even if we'd signed Leon, Lockyer and brought Sam back given the direction we've been heading in.

No one was fuming when Macca signed Sherriffe or Reardon or Worrincy IIRC, plenty of slightly underwhelmed responses but hoping the coach can bring him on, worth a punt type signings. In hindsight that was wrong, now we have a new coach, hoping he can bring on some new squad/punt players and signings. The difference is at this stage we know Macca probably wouldn't get the best out of Ainscough, Ah Van, Raynor etc, but Potter [imight[/i so there is no valid case as we stand today to not trust the judgement of Potter at this moment regarding squad signings and punts.

So yes if Macca made these sigings today after underperforming for years then yes we probably would be upset, but its not Macca making the signings, its Potter, so we're not...(mostly at least)

I think Raynor is a good solid signing especially if he's on low wages.

Edited for accuracy

If I were you FR I'd change that before the mod's do it for you................

WHy quote it then as it is now still there!

If he can give you anything like his proper form, then he is a pretty good signing. At least he will give your backs some kind of cutting edge. The current mob offer nothing to you.

No it isn't!!

To be honest without a 'report' button there's little else that can be done.

If he runs 10-20 yards forward, rather than 50 metres sideways, then he is an improvement on Sheriffe!!

But there is a report button

(Although admittedly, it appears to be ignored)