Their owner is a character too.

Yeah York seem to be mentioned quite a bit but they will also struggle to get to 15 points for the automatic spot so everyone has to hope that Salford, Hudds, or Hull completley mess up. I guess there is a chance but I would guess that with the experience of this year and what other teams have done, their points are more likely to go up rather than down. Added to that those 3 could simply choose to spend their funding on improvements off the field it really gives them a ridiculously weighted advantage.

So the Jason Hirst interview said we’re adding another point this month with primacy of the lease and building a directors box in the black seats on the halfway line. Performance we can aim for 0.35 through the 1885 cup and the championship final, and the 9th place from 3 years ago will fall away. I still don’t think that would be enough.

How many points do you get for the LED screen?

0.1?
It’s not much iirc

Will give us more chance than york, in reality what can the additionally do on top of what tgey have already done, cant really do additional work in the stands etc and are nowhere near filling the stadium

Big screen gets you neauwt unless the pixel concentration is high enough, Bullseye. LSV's (despite being adequate for UEFA matches to be staged there) was deemed to fail to meet the necessary IMG criteria and Leigh got nil this time for it.

Does IMG have a sideline in peddling acceptable screens?

Crooked as Trump!!

Ps: It's 0.125 pts (or nothing). The spec necessary can be found on page 30 of the IMG Handbook: https://www.rugby-league.com/uploads/do ... pdated.pdf

Ps: It's 0.125 pts (or nothing). The spec necessary can be found on page 30 of the IMG Handbook: https://www.rugby-league.com/uploads/do ... pdated.pdf

Same goes for the facilities, its either 1.5 for meeting all criteria or 0.5 for not. Some teams were under the impression that you got points for each thing which turned out not to be the case.

For “Utilisation” for the stadium the rules are as follows. As an example, if the stadium capacity is 10,000 and the average attendance is 5,000 the utilisation score will be 0.5. The average for the last three years is calculated and used.

I think Odsal’s capacity is still 26,019. We really could do with reducing that to as low as possible to maximise the score we can get.

This is what I mean Oldham got marked down because they moved into a better ground but other clubs benefited from the council reducing capacity on safety grounds.

Smash up the Rooley Ave terrace and pop side concrete so it's unsafe and get the council to mark it down to a 9K capacity ground. That's if the board have any ambition of being a Grade A club.

You could get it done in an afternoon at hardly any cost. Get the fans to bring sledge hammers and pick axes. Stick on tea and coffee and hey presto we're back in superleague. A fun afternoon out for the kids. Get Bullman and Bullboy encouraging teams of kids to push over the crush barriers.

The bar on the corner looks like it's half rotten anyway you could push that over easy enough and take out half the standing room.

https://www.examinerlive.co.uk/sport/ru ... gcGkA7lWYA

https://www.examinerlive.co.uk/sport/ru ... gcGkA7lWYA

Can’t se a queue of super league clubs voting for that one!

The ones who have there A already might do

That can't go through surely?

Theoretically down the track could you end up with the following scenario....?
11 grade A clubs and 1 grade B
The grade B club really gets its act together and wins SL, yet finds themselves relegated?