Idiotic post. There may be threads where one club's fans defend the indefensible, but in this one, saying there was nothing in it is confirmed as a perfectly valid, non-partisan view by the simple fact that the VR, who is not partisan, and saw it in far more detail than you, shares that view, as well as the on-field officials.

I'll be sure to remember that according to you referees get every decision right.
The club tinted glasses was aimed at both sets of fans to be honest, which I still stand by. The annoying/sad bit is that as soon as people disagree then name calling and petty squabbling ensues. As for castleford fans having a "victim complex" I'm sure Bradford fans are in the best position to be able to identify other like minded souls.

Bless.

Your blind belief in the judiciary duly bookmarked for future reference.

thought the tackle by Webster,think it was him,on Kearney was probably worse as he did appear to aim for the head with his shoulder.dont think it was late even though the ball had been kicked away by kearney but he was taken high.

Nice come back. Must have taken you ages to think of that one.

OK - please explain where the [imelodramatic over reaction bile [/iis within my original post.

Just because ok?

BTW, anyone wanting to have a pop at Tigertot can go through me first.

When does it get announced if he does / doesn't have to appear before Red Hall ??

Usually tuesday, but Ganson saw the incident and didnt see a problem, the VR didnt see a problem, and neither did the touch judges, or eddie and stevo. The only person who did was phil - wigan orgasm - clarke.

Bans are usually for incidents on report or incidents that the officials missed arent they?

Scruton cannot be disciplined. If the judiciary was allowed to disagree with a qualified video referee who had analysed the video replays of an incident, then we might as well pack the game in.

Charges are normally announced on Monday, with disciplinary panel taking place on Tuesday.