If when you blink, your eyes fill with sand, then you're probably you. [uYou're [/uthe man who wants a coaching team of Wayne Bennett, Daniel Anderson and McLennan. [uYou're[/u the man who wants us to sign up all the Origin squads, and the NZ squad as reserves. [uYou[/u want us to sack the board, sack the coach, sack the team, and play solely millionaires.

[uYou're[/u Walter McMitty.

"Marquee"? You mean "Big, Big, Money", let's pay someone Big Big Big MONEY (that we haven't got). At least I presume you mean this, as I haven't seen any player called "Marquee". Personally, if we are trying to define what a "marquee" player actually would be (which of course you don't), then I'd say Steve Menzies has more tent-like characteristics than anyone signed by anyone else, it was a stunning move by the Bulls, and there's no-one available whom I'd rather we had signed, but he's just one man, and in your delusion we need 25.

I am not arguing with myself though.

And I said this where exactly?

I never said I wanted any of the above, just that I do not want McNamara. However, perhaps you can show me where I did say as such or else you are making more things up.

You don't want McNamara?



I'm shocked. When have you ever said, or even hinted, at that?

I would have though that one such as you who reads things I have never actually ever written would maybe occasionally spot something that I actually [ihad.[/i

Oh, I spot 'em all mate, here's a flavour:-

Eddie - In His Own Words. Part 1: Uncanny predictions, and a desire to buy everyone:






Sweet?

so the gist of that is that at the time mystic was delighted with signings of sykes,godwin,nero and jeffries yet I'm pretty sure he's on record as saying they are all poor mcnamara signings. Bit of consistency would be nice or is 20/20 hindsight only allowed in mystics case?

sadly mystic meg has now turned into a caricature of a himself / a poor troll with his inncesant banging of his little mantra which has no relevance in the off season when there arent even any poor results to base it on

Delighted?

Delighted was a bit strong TBH but I thought the signings would do better than they did. However, I am not paid to make these decisions, the coach is. Either the players were not good enough in the first place or the coach is not getting the best out of decent players.

Hey, we all make mistakes, at least I can hold my hands up and accept it rather than try to blame other influences.

Incidentally FA, trawling back TWO YEARS worth of posts. What an utterly sad and boring individual you must be. And to think you call [ime[/i obsessed.

ROTFLMFAO

Perhaps he simply bookmarks the ones he deems more amusing . . . . . or noose like

at the time

Ah but his selective posting does not really tell the whole story TBF. After all, the posts he felt the need to highlight are commenting on speculation and links to players we have had over the last couple of years.

After all, this is a discussion board is it not? Therefore the clue is in the title and we can maybe discuss who we would/would not like to see at the club, in response to speculation.

I am hardly demanding we sign ANYONE but FA's "clever" posts try to suggest otherwise.

However, I am touched by his obsession. I will ensure i have a wee look on here in the morning in order to see what he has written this evening as it is not exactly likely that he will be off to any parties later on.....

So, you demand proof -but risk a bet that no-one will provide it!

Called your bluff, mate.

Happy New Year!