Its very concerning that we have someone in such a privledged position, who's spouting mis-truths and behaving in this manner. From the drunken swearing rant at the RFL, to this, if it was any other normal media person we'd be demanding he be removed from his position.

If a certain vice captain is here next year (hopefully) it be interesting to see how that interview would go. Wonder how said commentators employers would feel if the VC refused to be interviewed by said commentator.

Also if anyone feels like they've been here before, well it's because we have. You may remember I mentioned on the other thread mick had done this before under another alias (something like UNBELIVABULL) Well I didn't find that alias (I do remember Bullseye outing him out on here) but that was seperate and I don't think was regarding ownership. BUT I did come across this. Does anyone remember KCNBABT!!! Now Mick wasn't the prime suspect then but was certainly under suspicion. I must say I enjoy reading his previous posts of him pretending to be a sons dad and Roger outing him on it. Maybe just a coincidence though viewtopic.php?f=19&t=601831 viewtopic.php?f=19&t=601863

Also if anyone feels like they've been here before, well it's because we have. You may remember I mentioned on the other thread mick had done this before under another alias (something like UNBELIVABULL) Well I didn't find that alias (I do remember Bullseye outing him out on here) but that was seperate and I don't think was regarding ownership. BUT I did come across this. Does anyone remember KCNBABT!!! Now Mick wasn't the prime suspect then but was certainly under suspicion. I must say I enjoy reading his previous posts of him pretending to be a sons dad and Roger outing him on it. Maybe just a coincidence though viewtopic.php?f=19&t=601831 viewtopic.php?f=19&t=601863

Christ. You are a modern day Sherlock Holmes. I couldn't be faffed myself but keep digging.

To be fair to Mick, Chalmers could have text him Sunday to send wishes following the mugging. The comment regarding Going to ground is surely relating to being asked for info relating to accounts/sale etc and not replying to consortium. Two completely unrelated issues and likely two different forms of communication

Regarding Nestegg and Mr Gledhill - I for one have had enough. I do not know if there is any connection between these two posters but note that neither has denied what some on here have clearly implied.
I have learned to take anything Mr Gledhill “reports “ with a significant pinch of salt. Journalism / reporting should be more than regurgitating the last thing you heard from the last person you met.
He has understandably infuriated Roger, he has been exposed as a dissembler and I urge the moderators to remove him from this forum.
IF we have a team to support, I suspect that any retained players will remember the way he has angered Elliot’s father. And any new regime should act accordingly .

Bull Mania and Bullnorthern I really do appreciate what you have said, I really do.

It would make an interesting interview wouldn’t it. I guess I may get permanently banned from this forum if I said what somebody’s reaction has been to all the rubbish someone has been spouting, but as was also pointed out, it’s just pretty normal really for a certain person to make things up.

Anyone still think Gledhill and Nestegg are not the same person??

TBH, I don't really give a crap. Mostly because I take anything said on an internet forum with a pinch of salt with regards to its truth content.

But really, this whole song and dance around the Bulls again has just left me with a very sour taste in my mouth and in all honesty, I'm really wondering if it's worth the effort to try and maintain any sort of attempt to keep informed with anything about the club.

I am leaning heavily towards the "oh sod it, just fold the damn club and lets all be done with this rubbish" camp

I care about players and their dads getting upset because of being drip-fed a mixture of truth and lies in a cloak and dagger sort of way. That really bothers me and they deserve better.

But the rest of it washes over me. It's just become so boring going through this repetitive cycle of whispers and guess work. We do the same crap before we change ownership every time. I find it hard to even get annoyed anymore.

[i

Mick is one of a number of nestegg's journo information sources, happy to acknowledge that.

We've also learnt on occasions to double, if not triple, check what some journos tell us. So stop speculating Roger, you are still way off the mark. The forum owners and mod's know who we are, and if we weren't credible we'd be banned. We are credible and do care for the club. if you choose not to believe that then that's your problem mate; not ours.

What we all agree on is that many players (inc Eliiot) have been unfairly treated.

It’s probably more your problem than Rogers, given 90% of people on here think that your sole aim is to wind people up and stir the pot.

Given that you’ve been roundly rejected by posters on here, if you really care about the club and it’s fans wouldn’t you take the hint and leave?

Why don't you just identify yourself Eggy?

If you're genuine and you really care about the club and its fans, employees and volunteers then you surely wouldn't mind your statements being linked to your name either when they're either, A. Proven Correct, or B. Proven False, albeit with good intentions.

So far pal there's a lot of talk and hot air from you without anything worthwhile to back yourself up.

Just do it. You don't have anything to lose.

For the avoidance of doubt, and despite what was said above, there is absolutely no responsibility on anyone to be "credible". If there were I (and possibly one ot two more)wouldn't have lasted quite so long.... RA&B is a free forum, you just have to follow the AUP, simples.

Of course there isn't. But you may as well be.

Thanks for that clarification Bulliac.

We'll just treat the fact that we are in reality credible as a mere bonus lol

As for folk who say we have nothing to lose by outing ourselves. The fact is that we do have something substantial to lose, so until the time comes, which we hope will be before the start of next season, we will not reveal our identity over and above the hints already given.

One member did almost get it right in respect of the role of one nestegger. But given that most forum members incorrectly perceive that we are no more than malicious trouble causers then you can of course ignore us. So long as our truthful messages continue to be read by guest visitors to whom they are principally aimed, then we are content.

Hopefully, in time we very much hope that our fellow Bulls fans will also be content. Sadly, at this juncture the Bulls fans are allegedly about to be treated like fools for the 5th time in 6-7 years, i.e after Hood, OK, MG and AC. CB is different, but not different enough, and is sadly not being given the correct details re the true scale of the club's problems. As we've hinted at several times there's another scandal brewing involving circa £150K plus of allegedly misappropriated funds in respect of which CB is presently highly unlikely to be aware of. News of such an additional scandal should be reported upon within the next 3-4 weeks, if not sooner.

Wouldn't it make sense to make sure that such a 'scandal' is made known before the proposed Brereton takeover happens?

If you are so convinced there is a 'scandal', then surely you have a moral duty to make sure it is known about, to prevent further disruption and financial pain to players and creditors alike.