Personally I reckon it was because they were e, and the week they got found out by the Bulls and recieved a beating they never recovered from. Do you think that the excuse for losing in the cup final is because they were concentrating on the challenge cup final, or because Wolves had seen that their simple average game could be easily exploited and they exposed their frailities?

The Huddersfield you see next year will be the Huddersfield of always, e, boring and mediocre.
4TH place, LMFAO, absolutley no chance in Hell, I'll make 1 bet within my budget with anybody that Huddersfield dont even make the top 6, and 1 bet that Bulls finish above the Giants.

Don't count your chickens before they're hatched. I do think they'll be worse than last year, but we really need to improve.

There's no way the Bulls will not improve on last season. That's as high as it gets for Huddersfield though. They are .

I agree with the first, but the second is doubtful. I think that they will do worse than last year, but they could be the surprise package again, you never know.

They won't be, they'll finish 7th or below.
Their surprises have worn out, everybody knows what they are about and as we saw towards the back end they are a piece of to deal with. There's nothing new to come from Giants this season, I can assure you.

Cos its not often you are wrong, right?

Welcome back! Be good though, eh?

Oh good, another alias. This is always incredibly dull until the novelty of thinking nobody knows who he is wears off.

Was he banned again then? I must have missed that.

To be fair, knowing the Hudds forum from my previous adventure there, it's not difficult to get banned off there. One Hudds moderator was deleting any post I put on at one time, just because they weren't saying how awesome the Giants were (although that was a few years back now). I've also not heard good things about the Wakey forum, where if you dare post anything against them, they all "tell on you", so can't say I'm surprised at that either (although that is from second hand knowledge).

I'd assumed you were banned off here, which usually takes some doing from what I've seen.

My comment was purely based on that and from the looks of things, you've made a point of posting loads and some of the posts look slightly designed to antagonise. But, I could just be reading them that way, so benefit of doubt will be given.

I will retract what I said and apologise. If you just go back into the flow as before, I've no problem at all with that. Welcome back.

Must admit, I had no problems with the Terry Monster iteration - he was quite good and only slipped occasionally, but otherwise added to the debate IMO. And anyone who pîsses some of those muppets off (not all of them...just the fekkwittery) on the Wakey forum has to accrue some sympathy? Hell, the fekkwittery on there drove me away. They tend to be a tad partisan on the Hudds forum too, if you say anything that deviates from the script. And although I started posting on the T&A to try and persuade our wayward brother to repent and find the true path (thankless task, that, but someone has to do it... ), I jacked it in cos of "Haitch" and one or two others treating it as their personal fiefdom - so watching our friend wind Haitch up on there is quite amusing!

Dilli, I got banned from the Wakey forum, because although the 'mod' wasn't bothered about my good self, he couldn't be assed cleaning up the mess. But the mess came from the douchers who had a go at my good self for saying Tronc wouldn't be man of steel, on a 'Tronc for MOS' thread. Hardly unreasonable is it?

OK new season, new start though.

That wouldn't be public criticism of a Mod would it? . . . . albeit not on RAB

No?

Thought it must have been just a slip of the keyboard . . . .

Remember : the AUP is your friend. Play nicely within it

To be fair, the very (VERY) few times I've been over to the Wakey forum, that sounds like exactly the sort of thing that would get them all miffed. I seem to remember going over and seeing something like them suggesting Leo-Latu was the best hooker in the league, or something equally as stupid, and the minute I questioned it, they all jumped on me like some rabid pack of dogs. They were a little touchy for absolutely no reason.

Regarding the Hudds site, the mod I had all the trouble with, I'm pretty sure isn't a mod over there any more (I suspect there was more than me had issues with him), so I assumed that wasn't so bad these days. Perhaps not though eh?