Im not sure I buy this "people dont post just because of certain posters stuff" If you dont want to post for whatever reason then dont, fine, I didnt post much over the off season as I thought it might be all a bit negative and my work commitments changed, but it wasnt because of any one poster and I still read the board occationally. But to say your put off by one individuals attitude is not something I understand, just avoid reading or commenting on that persons posts and make your own thoughts known. So I wouldnt feel too bad about other proples percieved problems with posting if I were you. just maybe dont put "Mystic Eddie" on the back of your bulls shirt the next time you visit Odsal - just to be safe.

I disagree with the negativity and so I've said so, but I respect the views of yourself, RER, Paul and others who are clearly more cheesed off with the situation than me (despite you clearly being in the wrong ) and we need people to feel they can put both sides of the discussion in an open forum, and I think for the most part that is the case.

We are all (mostly) Bradford fans at the end of the day afterall.

...I await your new thread after the 10th game of the season with great interest...

One thing that puzzles me a bit is thisin some cases[/i some duplication may be inevitable, but what I would say a lot more than 5 people resent is where thread after thread is funnelled back down the "Sack Mac" route.

I said earlier that if someone finds that a particular thread is (or has become) irritating or irrelevant to them then they don't have to read it. But there is the next problem, since if someone who doesn't have as firm views, shall we say, on the "Sack Mac" issue, finds that half the threads are developing into a re-hash of the main "Sack Mac" thread then they will very likley get pished off.

So as a Bulls fan - what to do? If an NT post pops up in a thread, the choice for me is eitherthe posting of the NT comment on a thread that was nothing to do with it that started the thread derailment. If the NT post 'em, then I for one [iwill[/i respond to them, as the NT views are just that, the NT's personal opinions, not given facts, and so I will respond with my opinions.

You therefore need to look at which post started the particular argument in any thread. If that is allowed to stand, then it has got to be fair enough to allow replies. Otherwise the point of a forum for discussion is defeated.

Yes, we have one!!

I think if you don't go to games, you should make no comment on the performance

What happens if you see the game on Sky, or the highlights on the SL show?

Wouldn't that disqualify af from posting as well?

The solution is swift, intelligent and incisive modding. So we're f..ked.

I think unless you have a professional qualification you shouldn't use a compuetr. deliberate mis-spelling on the grounds of irony

I've just logged in, can anyone summarise the previous 4 pages so I don't have to read it all?

That's marvelous

Or a chainsaw.

Especially a chainsaw in fact.