Quote: mystic eddie "Christ so many followers on here now. It is becoming my own little twitter account on here now. Clearly the newly formed Kyle Briggs Appreciation Society is growing.
OK, not answering one by one but I will try to summarise.
* Briggs being sent on loan pretty much proves what a few on here have thought. He is not good enough for us. Perhaps the experience will help but the rumours that we are in the market for a new halfback suggest that his days are limited.'"
That's your opinion. However, if it was a case of the club giving up on him, why was his loan deal only for 1 month and not until the end of the season? I think it's more a case of his dropping down the pecking order at Bradford and the club would rather he was getting more SL experience rather than being sat in the u21's. Also the rumours about our new half back mention quota players. So if any half back should be concerned about his place it's Herbert as he's not only a quota player but only here on a 1 year contract.
Quote: mystic eddie "
* We have looked considerably better as a side (from what I have seen as well as match reports and views) when BJ has returned. A player considered not good enough a couple of seasons ago. Pretty much a journeyman player is miles ahead of him.'"
BJ is a scrum half and is taking on a lot of the organisational responsibility which seems to help him flourish, unlike his previous stint at Bradford where he was 2nd fiddle to Deacon and Harris.
Quote: mystic eddie "
* Out of his depth. It was clear to see after the first game v Leeds that he was out of his depth. He had a half decent first thirty minutes then was awful for the remaining fifty minutes of the game. All this talk of his "injury" seemed convenient timing.'"
Yes that "convenient" injury that put him out for a month or so. I agree fully, completely fabrication to cover his bad 2nd half performance
[/color:p889vjdy]:d7dc4b20b2c2dd7b76ac6eac29d5604e_54039.jpg
