FORUMS FORUMS






RLFANS.COM
Celebrating
25 years service to
the Rugby League
Community!
  
FORUMS > Bradford Bulls > This is why Caisley shouldnt be allowed near the club £2.5m
58 posts in 5 pages 
<<   PREV  NEXT   >>
Subscribe | Moderators: Admin
RankPostsTeam
International Star1795No
Team
Selected
JoinedServiceReputation
Jan 201114 years
OnlineLast PostLast Page
Apr 2021Jan 2021LINK
Milestone Posts
0
100
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Signature
54218_1349939535.jpg
:d7dc4b20b2c2dd7b76ac6eac29d5604e_54218.jpg



Quote: stevo#4 "I dont have any evidence. I spoke directly with the people (notably the player) involved in the "saga" at the time it was going on.'"


Leeds were going to take both Harris and us to court. We settled, but Leeds said they were still going to go after Harris. He in turn blamed his solicitors for advising him and said he was going to sue them. We had already shown that Leeds were prepared to settle, and thats probably what happened on the quiet with the solicitors PI insurance paying Leeds.

I still have trouble with the sums though. Leeds had the option to sign him for twelve months, no more, and they had to pay the same rate as Cardiff, a basic of £200000 plus bonuses which you have to net off the income they lost through him not playing for them that year. so according to your source their losses were 1,500,000 minus £350,000 which is £1,150,000 compensation from Harris/his ex solicitors. that is a lot of money for one year by the time you have added back his salary of surely over £300,000 for that year, its back up to £1.5M. No wonder Leeds wanted to be sensible. It would not surprise me that the whole thing was £500,000 in total ie us 350,000 and Harris £150,000 from PI, not per year. If not then his ex solicitors are paying through the nose for PI insurance, oh dear.

but thanks for your posts, its helped my understanding of the whole issue even if it hasnt changed my guestimate.

RankPostsTeam
International Board Member9565No
Team
Selected
JoinedServiceReputation
May 200222 years
OnlineLast PostLast Page
Dec 2019Dec 2019LINK
Milestone Posts
0
100
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Signature
fonds noir/Buzz Lightyear.gif
:fonds noir/Buzz Lightyear.gif



The whole Harris saga could and should have been sorted out without going to court.

In any event what should have happened - and ought to be the case for any disputes between RFL member clubs - is mandatory independent arbitration, including binding results of said arbitration on both parties. Whoever replaces Lewis should make damn sure such a rule is in place to prevent anything like this happening again. I got blasted on the Leeds board a while ago for daring to suggest that even though it looked like Leeds might win the case, they should drop the whole thing. It is simply not worth the negative impact its had on the Bulls.

Even in standard commercial agreements the use of mandatory arbitration (at least before any consideration of going to court) is quite common. I find it bizarre that in a relatively small, underfinanced sport like RL, member clubs are apparently able to blast each other into non-existence by following ridiculously expensive court actions.

RankPostsTeam
Club Coach850No
Team
Selected
JoinedServiceReputation
Jan 200520 years
OnlineLast PostLast Page
Jan 2014Jul 2013LINK
Milestone Posts
0
100
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Signature

Never liked Kevin Costner, or any other Robbing Hood!!!!:



Quote: BrisbaneRhino "The whole Harris saga could and should have been sorted out without going to court.

'"

The problem is, the biggest part of it was!!! The BUlls were never found by a court to have induced Harris to break his contract, nor was Harris found to be breaching his contract. they were both setteld out of court. IMO Harris only settled because the bulls had and this weakened his position! The only court judgement was that Harris was not having his trade restrained by leeds inserting the first option to the agreement.

if it had gone to court, at least we could have seen who was right or wrong, and just how bad CC's judgemnet was. as it is, he's always got the defence of " we would have won if Hood hadnt bottled it"

RankPostsTeam
Club Coach3998
JoinedServiceReputation
Mar 200520 years
OnlineLast PostLast Page
Nov 2024Oct 2024LINK
Milestone Posts
0
100
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Signature
13554.jpg
The phrase politically correct is in itself politcally incorrect so should be rephrased politically stupid! If you like old type radio comedy/ dramas etc listen to //pumpkinfm.com/ Statistically speaking you have a better chance of getting dead the older you get! Thank god only when you find a religion that passes the truth test!:13554.jpg



Quote: isaac1 "The problem is, the biggest part of it was!!! The BUlls were never found by a court to have induced Harris to break his contract, nor was Harris found to be breaching his contract. they were both setteld out of court. IMO Harris only settled because the bulls had and this weakened his position! The only court judgement was that Harris was not having his trade restrained by leeds inserting the first option to the agreement.

if it had gone to court, at least we could have seen who was right or wrong, and just how bad CC's judgemnet was. as it is, he's always got the defence of " we would have won if Hood hadnt bottled it"'"


Well the as far as I know Caisley refused to go to Court thus weakening the Bulls position, without Caisley there the case was considerably weakened, the Club had no option but to settle out of Court in the Whinos favour, Caisley never had a defence, he was the one who "bottled" it

RankPostsTeam
International Star1795No
Team
Selected
JoinedServiceReputation
Jan 201114 years
OnlineLast PostLast Page
Apr 2021Jan 2021LINK
Milestone Posts
0
100
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Signature
54218_1349939535.jpg
:d7dc4b20b2c2dd7b76ac6eac29d5604e_54218.jpg



Blotto In view of Judge Grays ruling that clause 5 applied, and given that Harris had not complied with Clause 5 there was no way Leeds could lose a breach of contract claim against Harris. I cannot comment on the inducement issue, but Caisley is a solicitor and will know only too well what defending such a claim, so I would have done exactly the same. Which are strange words for me to write as whilst I was a Caisley fan until about 2007 I most definitely am not now.

Isaac1it was not just restraint of trade that were put as arguements against the enforceability of that clause, uncertainty (the amount Leeds would pay him under the contract clause could not be precisely calculated) and lack of consideration (ie Leeds gave Harris nothing in exchange for that clause). Gray ruled that it could be calculated with reasonable certainty, and that Harris had received the benefit of two years higher pay with Cardiff than at Leeds so had received consideration.
once he had ruled that the clause was enforceable it was shooting fish in a barrel time for Leeds.

RankPostsTeam
Club Coach1020No
Team
Selected
JoinedServiceReputation
Jan 200520 years
OnlineLast PostLast Page
Aug 2022Feb 2022LINK
Milestone Posts
0
100
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Signature

:



Quote: martinwildbull "but thanks for your posts, its helped my understanding of the whole issue even if it hasnt changed my guestimate.'"


No problem at all.
Take a look at this link: www.thetelegraphandargus.co.uk/s ... ulls_back/
As you can see the three installments were well documented
Where they show on the BB's accounts I do not know - Im not an accountant and I have no intention to be.

I do know the outcome of Harris v his solicitors, but as this is a discussion about BB - we'll leave that there.
Quote: martinwildbull "but thanks for your posts, its helped my understanding of the whole issue even if it hasnt changed my guestimate.'"


No problem at all.
Take a look at this link: www.thetelegraphandargus.co.uk/s ... ulls_back/
As you can see the three installments were well documented
Where they show on the BB's accounts I do not know - Im not an accountant and I have no intention to be.

I do know the outcome of Harris v his solicitors, but as this is a discussion about BB - we'll leave that there.


RankPostsTeam
International Star1795No
Team
Selected
JoinedServiceReputation
Jan 201114 years
OnlineLast PostLast Page
Apr 2021Jan 2021LINK
Milestone Posts
0
100
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Signature
54218_1349939535.jpg
:d7dc4b20b2c2dd7b76ac6eac29d5604e_54218.jpg



Quote: stevo#4 "No problem at all.
Take a look at this link:
I can guess the outcome of that one... solicitors always win. If they dont their PI insurance covers it. its called a win win situation. Which brings me back to the question if Harris had recourse to his solicitors, why didnt we?

I did have a look at that article, but it only states that that there were three installments not how much. Another article somewhere said it was equal instalments, hence my calculation using that and the accruals figures in the Bulls accounts. The cash flow statements in the Bulls accounts support a figure of around that amount too, and in case you hadnt guessed i am an accountant.

and btw Caisley responded to that article by saying that Harris was not an excuse any longer for poor performance on and off the field. The fact that the settlement was probably mostly treated as a cost in the accounts several years before gives that a small element of truth. But only small.

RankPostsTeam
International Star26No
Team
Selected
JoinedServiceReputation
Mar 201213 years
OnlineLast PostLast Page
Jun 2012May 2012LINK
Milestone Posts
0
100
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Signature

:



Someone posted the court documents from the Leeds V Harris V Bradford case but i cant see the link to them.

Could that person please do so again so I can print them and show a leeds fan at work who is adamant Leeds didnt get anything from us or the WRU for his tfr.

Thanks

RankPostsTeam
International Board Member9565No
Team
Selected
JoinedServiceReputation
May 200222 years
OnlineLast PostLast Page
Dec 2019Dec 2019LINK
Milestone Posts
0
100
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Signature
fonds noir/Buzz Lightyear.gif
:fonds noir/Buzz Lightyear.gif



My point wasn't about the ins-and-outs of the Harris case in particular. The point is that RFL member clubs should find it almost impossible to engage in legal proceedings against one another, as the rules should force them to use binding arbitration rather than resort to legal action.

Arbitration is far, far cheaper, and the rulings/findings of the arbitrators would be able to incorporate the fact that we are actually dealing with what are quite small businesses - i.e. no ridiculous monetary penalties would be imposed.

As it stands, it seems that RFL member clubs are able to resort to highly expensive legal action which ALWAYS results in a net outflow of cash from the game to lawyers. I just don't get it.

RankPostsTeam
International Star300
JoinedServiceReputation
Apr 201213 years
OnlineLast PostLast Page
Jun 2014Jun 2014LINK
Milestone Posts
0
100
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Signature
67272_1369898145.jpg
:d7dc4b20b2c2dd7b76ac6eac29d5604e_67272.jpg



Quote: bowlingbull "Someone posted the court documents from the Leeds V Harris V Bradford case but i cant see the link to them.

Could that person please do so again so I can print them and show a leeds fan at work who is adamant Leeds didnt get anything from us or the WRU for his tfr.

Thanks'"


www.5rb.com/case/Leeds-Rugby-Ltd ... ldings-Ltd
Quote: bowlingbull "Someone posted the court documents from the Leeds V Harris V Bradford case but i cant see the link to them.

Could that person please do so again so I can print them and show a leeds fan at work who is adamant Leeds didnt get anything from us or the WRU for his tfr.

Thanks'"


www.5rb.com/case/Leeds-Rugby-Ltd ... ldings-Ltd


RankPostsTeam
International Chairman14145No
Team
Selected
JoinedServiceReputation
Dec 200123 years
OnlineLast PostLast Page
Aug 2020Oct 2019LINK
Milestone Posts
0
100
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Signature
45_1302643626.jpg
:d7dc4b20b2c2dd7b76ac6eac29d5604e_45.jpg



Quote: BrisbaneRhino "My point wasn't about the ins-and-outs of the Harris case in particular. The point is that RFL member clubs should find it almost impossible to engage in legal proceedings against one another, as the rules should force them to use binding arbitration rather than resort to legal action.

Arbitration is far, far cheaper, and the rulings/findings of the arbitrators would be able to incorporate the fact that we are actually dealing with what are quite small businesses - i.e. no ridiculous monetary penalties would be imposed.

As it stands, it seems that RFL member clubs are able to resort to highly expensive legal action which ALWAYS results in a net outflow of cash from the game to lawyers. I just don't get it.'"


Indeed. Same as most folk never got it that the loss of profit to Leeds because Harris did not return to them was £3.2m, according to their legal action. That would have made Leeds far far and away the most profitable club the game had ever known, I guess, hade Harris actually returned to them. Must have been some absolutely unvelievable sponsorship deals on the table... eusa_think.gif

But the RFL as then constituted seemed to have no qualms about one SL club seeking to blast another into oblivion. Presumably it could happen again?

RankPostsTeam
Player Coach3224
JoinedServiceReputation
Aug 200519 years
OnlineLast PostLast Page
Oct 2018May 2016LINK
Milestone Posts
0
100
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Signature
17505_1301920246.jpg
:d7dc4b20b2c2dd7b76ac6eac29d5604e_17505.jpg



I suspect they were already viewing the antics of BBH, and that chubby little welshman with distaste, and were perfectly happy for you to receive a legal handbagging....

[i"The case presented a classic conflict between player and club. Its main interest lies in the restraint of trade findings. Did the law require this star player to be protected against a restriction accepted with professional advice? The judge saw it as a fair deal from which Harris had benefited considerably. Leeds had waived a valuable contract with 2 years to run, giving the player the chance of better pay at Cardiff (£200K pa plus bonuses) and membership of the national union team. If he was required to go back to Leeds the contract guaranteed that Harris would be no worse off than if he had stayed at Cardiff."[/i

RankPostsTeam
International Chairman14145No
Team
Selected
JoinedServiceReputation
Dec 200123 years
OnlineLast PostLast Page
Aug 2020Oct 2019LINK
Milestone Posts
0
100
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Signature
45_1302643626.jpg
:d7dc4b20b2c2dd7b76ac6eac29d5604e_45.jpg



£3.2m plus costs is hardly "Handbagging", any more than blasting someone with a bazooka at point-blank range is likely to lead to just some bad bruising for the recipient.

Think I'll stick with "Blasting another club into oblivion", if its all the same to you.

Maybe the RFL was as unhappy with Caisley as Caddick was, and so were entirely at ease with seeing one club totally destroy another?

And you'll get no bonus points on here for quoting reasons why Caisley seemingly got it so badly wrong; most of us came to realise that ages ago, which is one of the reasons why he is not being universally welcomed as a white knight riding to the rescue.

RankPostsTeam
International Chairman28357
JoinedServiceReputation
Feb 200223 years
OnlineLast PostLast Page
May 2024Oct 2019LINK
Milestone Posts
0
100
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Signature
973_1515165968.gif
Last edited by Ferocious Aardvark on stardate Jun 26, 3013 11:27 am, edited 48,562,867,458,300,023 times in total:d7dc4b20b2c2dd7b76ac6eac29d5604e_973.gif



Indeed. In fact, has Caisley ever uttered a single word of regret or any syllable of acceptance that he did actually get the Harris thing at all wrong? I can't readily recall one, so presumably his position is still that there was nothing wrong with the signing.

RankPostsTeam
International Chairman7594
JoinedServiceReputation
Dec 200123 years
OnlineLast PostLast Page
May 2021May 2021LINK
Milestone Posts
0
100
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Signature
8_1434361123.jpg
When my club didn't exist it was still bigger than yours:d7dc4b20b2c2dd7b76ac6eac29d5604e_8.jpg



I have my doubts that the Kaiser has uttered a single word of regret on any matter ever.

58 posts in 5 pages 
<<   PREV  NEXT   >>
Subscribe | Moderators: Admin
58 posts in 5 pages 
<<   PREV  NEXT   >>
Subscribe | Moderators: Admin



All views expressed are those of the author and not necessarily those of the RLFANS.COM or its subsites.

Whilst every effort is made to ensure that news stories, articles and images are correct, we cannot be held responsible for errors. However, if you feel any material on this website is copyrighted or incorrect in any way please contact us using the link at the top of the page so we can remove it or negotiate copyright permission.

RLFANS.COM, the owners of this website, is not responsible for the content of its sub-sites or posts, please email the author of this sub-site or post if you feel you find an article offensive or of a choice nature that you disagree with.

Copyright 1999 - 2024 RLFANS.COM

You must be 18+ to gamble, for more information and for help with gambling issues see https://www.begambleaware.org/.



Please Support RLFANS.COM


1.609375:5
RLFANS Recent Posts
FORUM
LAST
POST
TOPIC
POSTER
POSTS
47m
Recruitment rumours and links
Or thane
3485
53m
2024/25 out of season mind occupier 2
Or thane
10
Recent
Film game
karetaker
4967
Recent
England Vs Samoa Test Series
Father Ted
72
Recent
Its all gone a bit quiet
BigTime
5
FORUM
LAST
VIEW
TOPIC
POSTER
POSTS
2m
2025 Season tickets
Eastern Wild
134
3m
2025 Recruitment
Highlander
155
3m
Aston Banned
MP
5
4m
England vs Samoa
NickyKiss
88
5m
BORED The Band Name Game
Boss Hog
62909
5m
DoR - New Coach - Investor & Adam - New signings
Hessle Roade
3635
6m
McMeekan
Trojan Horse
13
6m
2024/25 out of season mind occupier 2
Or thane
10
11m
Pre Season - 2025
The games af
40
15m
Game - Song Titles
Boss Hog
40438
FORUM
NEW
TOPICS
TOPIC
POSTER
POSTS
TODAY
Its all gone a bit quiet
BigTime
5
TODAY
England Beat Samoa To Take Test Series
RLFANS News
1
TODAY
McMeekan
Trojan Horse
13
TODAY
Englands Women Demolish The Welsh
RLFANS News
1
TODAY
Lee Kershaw
Big lads mat
9
TODAY
2025 Shirt
MR FRISK
10
TODAY
Home Shirt 2025
MattyB
1
TODAY
Uele contract extension
Khlav Kalash
5
TODAY
Squad for Match 2 v Samoa
rubber ducki
6
TODAY
2024/25 out of season mind occupier 2
Or thane
10
TODAY
Sky tv deals
ninearches
6
TODAY
2024/25 out of season mind occupier 1
Lord Tony Sm
24
TODAY
New Kit
MorePlaymake
57
TODAY
Memorable Games
Rugby Raider
6
TODAY
Hybrid rugby
moto748
11
TODAY
Pre Season - 2025
The games af
40
TODAY
England v Australia
karetaker
24
TODAY
The Aussies are coming
Bullseye
17
TODAY
England Beat Samoa Comfortably In First Test
RLFANS News
1
TODAY
England v Samoa
Captain Hook
33
TODAY
England vs Samoa
NickyKiss
88
TODAY
Trinity back on super league forum
RoyBoy29
4
TODAY
IN 2025 Maika Sivo - Expires 2028
batleyrhino
36
TODAY
Danny McGuire new head coach
Huddersfield
1
TODAY
What happens now
Start@1873
3
TODAY
Liam Kay
Wollo-Wollo-
53
TODAY
Coach announced
The Dors
14
NEWS ITEMS
VIEWS
England Beat Samoa To Take Tes..
263
England's Women Demolish The W..
249
England Beat Samoa Comfortably..
637
Operational Rules Tribunal –..
488
IMG-RFL club gradings released..
633
Wakefield Trinity Win Champion..
1264
Hunslet Secure Promotion After..
1487
Trinity Into Play Off Final Af..
1758
Wigan Warriors Crowned Champio..
1334
York Valkyrie Win Back to Back..
1607
Hunslet Book Relegation Play O..
1958
Penrith Panthers Secure Fourth..
1540
Wigan Humiliate Leigh For Gran..
1633
Hull KR Survive Warrington Fig..
1747
Warrington Wolves Break Saints..
1966
POSTSONLINEREGISTRATIONSRECORD
19.64M 866 80,15414,103
LOGIN HERE
or REGISTER for more features!.

When you register you get access to the live match scores, live match chat and you can post in the discussions on the forums.
RLFANS Match Centre
There are currently no matches to display.
Matches on TV
Sat 2nd Nov
MINT2024 3 England M34-16Samoa M
WINT2024 2 ENGLAND W82-0WALES W
Sun 27th Oct
MINT2024 2 England M34-18Samoa M
This is an inplay table and live positions can change.
Mens Betfred Super League XXVIII ROUND : 1
 PLDFADIFFPTS
Wigan 29 768 338 430 48
Hull KR 29 731 344 387 44
Warrington 29 769 351 418 42
Leigh 29 580 442 138 33
Salford 28 556 561 -5 32
St.Helens 28 618 411 207 30
 
Catalans 27 475 427 48 30
Leeds 27 530 488 42 28
Huddersfield 27 468 658 -190 20
Castleford 27 425 735 -310 15
Hull FC 27 328 894 -566 6
LondonB 27 317 916 -599 6
This is an inplay table and live positions can change.
Betfred Championship 2024 ROUND : 1
 PLDFADIFFPTS
Wakefield 27 1032 275 757 52
Toulouse 26 765 388 377 37
Bradford 28 723 420 303 36
York 29 695 501 194 32
Widnes 27 561 502 59 29
Featherstone 27 634 525 109 28
 
Sheffield 26 626 526 100 28
Doncaster 26 498 619 -121 25
Halifax 26 509 650 -141 22
Batley 26 422 591 -169 22
Swinton 28 484 676 -192 20
Barrow 25 442 720 -278 19
Whitehaven 25 437 826 -389 18
Dewsbury 27 348 879 -531 4
Hunslet 1 6 10 -4 0
RLFANS Recent Posts
FORUM
LAST
POST
TOPIC
POSTER
POSTS
47m
Recruitment rumours and links
Or thane
3485
53m
2024/25 out of season mind occupier 2
Or thane
10
Recent
Film game
karetaker
4967
Recent
England Vs Samoa Test Series
Father Ted
72
Recent
Its all gone a bit quiet
BigTime
5
FORUM
LAST
VIEW
TOPIC
POSTER
POSTS
2m
2025 Season tickets
Eastern Wild
134
3m
2025 Recruitment
Highlander
155
3m
Aston Banned
MP
5
4m
England vs Samoa
NickyKiss
88
5m
BORED The Band Name Game
Boss Hog
62909
5m
DoR - New Coach - Investor & Adam - New signings
Hessle Roade
3635
6m
McMeekan
Trojan Horse
13
6m
2024/25 out of season mind occupier 2
Or thane
10
11m
Pre Season - 2025
The games af
40
15m
Game - Song Titles
Boss Hog
40438
FORUM
NEW
TOPICS
TOPIC
POSTER
POSTS
TODAY
Its all gone a bit quiet
BigTime
5
TODAY
England Beat Samoa To Take Test Series
RLFANS News
1
TODAY
McMeekan
Trojan Horse
13
TODAY
Englands Women Demolish The Welsh
RLFANS News
1
TODAY
Lee Kershaw
Big lads mat
9
TODAY
2025 Shirt
MR FRISK
10
TODAY
Home Shirt 2025
MattyB
1
TODAY
Uele contract extension
Khlav Kalash
5
TODAY
Squad for Match 2 v Samoa
rubber ducki
6
TODAY
2024/25 out of season mind occupier 2
Or thane
10
TODAY
Sky tv deals
ninearches
6
TODAY
2024/25 out of season mind occupier 1
Lord Tony Sm
24
TODAY
New Kit
MorePlaymake
57
TODAY
Memorable Games
Rugby Raider
6
TODAY
Hybrid rugby
moto748
11
TODAY
Pre Season - 2025
The games af
40
TODAY
England v Australia
karetaker
24
TODAY
The Aussies are coming
Bullseye
17
TODAY
England Beat Samoa Comfortably In First Test
RLFANS News
1
TODAY
England v Samoa
Captain Hook
33
TODAY
England vs Samoa
NickyKiss
88
TODAY
Trinity back on super league forum
RoyBoy29
4
TODAY
IN 2025 Maika Sivo - Expires 2028
batleyrhino
36
TODAY
Danny McGuire new head coach
Huddersfield
1
TODAY
What happens now
Start@1873
3
TODAY
Liam Kay
Wollo-Wollo-
53
TODAY
Coach announced
The Dors
14
NEWS ITEMS
VIEWS
England Beat Samoa To Take Tes..
263
England's Women Demolish The W..
249
England Beat Samoa Comfortably..
637
Operational Rules Tribunal –..
488
IMG-RFL club gradings released..
633
Wakefield Trinity Win Champion..
1264
Hunslet Secure Promotion After..
1487
Trinity Into Play Off Final Af..
1758
Wigan Warriors Crowned Champio..
1334
York Valkyrie Win Back to Back..
1607
Hunslet Book Relegation Play O..
1958
Penrith Panthers Secure Fourth..
1540
Wigan Humiliate Leigh For Gran..
1633
Hull KR Survive Warrington Fig..
1747
Warrington Wolves Break Saints..
1966


Visit the RLFANS.COM SHOP
for more merchandise!