|
 |
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 5078 | Leeds Rhinos |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Sep 2006 | 19 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
May 2025 | Feb 2025 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote Bullseye="Bullseye"Surprised to say the least! Great news but I wonder how the club managed to get the ban overturned? '"
Quote Bullseye="sir steve menzies"
some one said earlier leeds and hetherington are too far up the RFLs ar5e that they have only given him a fine'"
Is it possible that the Bulls now are too far up the RFL'S ar5se also? 
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 7122 | Bradford Bulls |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Dec 2007 | 17 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Feb 2025 | Feb 2025 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| I honestly thought a 1 match ban was fair as I said earlier but i can't complain at this makes Sundays match a whole different looking proposition.
Nice one
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 12310 | Whitehaven |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Oct 2006 | 19 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Feb 2023 | Feb 2023 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| It's good having the England coach at the Bulls 
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 12310 | Whitehaven |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Oct 2006 | 19 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Feb 2023 | Feb 2023 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote The Panel, meeting in Leeds, viewed the incident and listened to submissions from the player, Bulls Assistant Coach Lee St Hilaire and Bulls Football Manager Stuart Duffy.
'"
Probably nothing, but why not McNamara??
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Club Coach | 9554 | Bradford Bulls |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Jun 2005 | 20 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Feb 2025 | Nov 2024 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote Ewwenorfolk="Ewwenorfolk"Probably nothing, but why not McNamara??'"
conflict of interest maybe as he works for RFL as well as bulls?
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Chairman | 17181 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Dec 2001 | 23 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
May 2025 | Feb 2025 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Terrible tackle that deserved a ban. But it was not deliberate, it is out of character, & I have no problem with the ban being overturned. I hope some of the childish muppets on here are enjoying more humble pie for breakfast.
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Chairman | 17181 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Dec 2001 | 23 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
May 2025 | Feb 2025 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote Ewwenorfolk="Ewwenorfolk"Probably nothing, but why not McNamara??'"
Someone at the club told me it was because he'd already agreed it in advance with the RFL.
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 12310 | Whitehaven |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Oct 2006 | 19 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Feb 2023 | Feb 2023 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote tigertot="tigertot"Someone at the club told me it was because he'd already agreed it in advance with the RFL.'"
I wasn't trying to imply that btw.
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 993 | Bradford Bulls |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Apr 2009 | 16 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Apr 2022 | Apr 2022 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Good news, lets hope we can stuff them on Sunday 
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Chairman | 28357 | Bradford Bulls |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Feb 2002 | 23 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
May 2024 | Oct 2019 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote Bullseye="Bullseye" Great news but I wonder how the club managed to get the ban overturned? ..'"
Easy. We just sat there and sykesd them out
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Club Coach | 7239 | |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Apr 2005 | 20 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Aug 2024 | Feb 2020 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| One thing I don't get (and apologies if this has already been mentioned).
The incident got referred to the panel, who presumably watched the video and decided it was worth a ban (I've not seen it on the telly myself and don't remember it at the game, so couldn't comment on how bad it is or anything).
After that, the club/player appealed, and the findings of the appeal cleared Sykes of any wrongdoing. Presumably they're watching the same footage? If so, how the hell does one viewing ban him for a match and the other viewing clear him of any wrongdoing?
Do they have two seperate video watching panels, one of which has the benefit of sight and the other of which is full of people from the local blind institute?
As I say, I honestly don't know which of the findings was correct, as I haven't seen the tackle, but either way, how do two of them see something entirely different?
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Chairman | 14145 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Dec 2001 | 23 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Aug 2020 | Oct 2019 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote DILLIGAF="DILLIGAF"One thing I don't get (and apologies if this has already been mentioned).
The incident got referred to the panel, who presumably watched the video and decided it was worth a ban (I've not seen it on the telly myself and don't remember it at the game, so couldn't comment on how bad it is or anything).
After that, the club/player appealed, and the findings of the appeal cleared Sykes of any wrongdoing. Presumably they're watching the same footage? If so, how the hell does one viewing ban him for a match and the other viewing clear him of any wrongdoing?
Do they have two seperate video watching panels, one of which has the benefit of sight and the other of which is full of people from the local blind institute?
As I say, I honestly don't know which of the findings was correct, as I haven't seen the tackle, but either way, how do two of them see something entirely different?'"
You can only assume the same way a panel of senior beaks can overturn the ruling of a lower beak? And the way a panel of even more senior beaks sat on fancy red benches and with a fancy ermine-trimmed robe can in turn overturn THEIR ruling? In other words, you have more experienced bodies sat on thge appeals panel? If not, then it beats the hell out of me!
|
|
|
 |
|