No it isn't

Chris Thorman to be a Bulls player next season

P!ss off!!



Now that would depress me..

In which way.

Rooney to Hull, Thorman to Bulls. No joke.

Deary me, I hope not.

Why not sign him, he's mediocre.

I also heard the 'Burgess to Manly' story from a half reliable source. Seen more bizarre things happen.

Heres what Hood said:
[urlhttp://www.thetelegraphandargus.co.uk/search/3591755.Dwindling_fans_have_knock_on_effect/[/url

I'd take Thorman over Deacon. I'd also take him as an extra to Jeffries to create competition in our halves.

If he was coming in as a straight replacement for Jeffries though without any other halves coming, I'd be somewhat disappointed.

Thorman may not be that good these days, but having 3 half backs of ANY kind is better than only having 2 that are guaranteed to get picked week in, week out.

That article is full of stupid statements



No. What raised expectations is that, at that point, we were still the 2nd most successful side in SL. We're a team that should be fighting for championships, not scraping at the bottom of the table.

Give how things are and that it can take some sides a year to get up to speed in SL (Castleford, Catalands, HKR are what I'm using as examples here) i fear that next year, if there are serious changes at the club. We'll be 14th

We're a team that very nearly got relegated within less than twenty years ago. A team that went out of existence in front of three hundred people less than fifty years ago. If you're going to appeal to the annals of history, at least try to leaf through a fair spread of the pages.