It's £20 for Craven Park according to Bulls website for away tickets.

Whether I go or not depends on my health. I am on a BIG session on Friday and expect to be very very hungover. As long as that hangover has cleared by Sunday lunchtime, I'll go to the game.

I have a habit of getting some real monster hangovers though, so I shall have to see.

Apparently so.. time you've paid for parking, petrol, a beer or two etc and suddenly you've spent close to £50!

I was having this conversation with Eddievan earlier. The worry is less that they will go watch another (better-performing) club, but that they - or many of them - will be lost as fans to RL, maybe forever.

Hmm, well the info I had was from someone else. Is the £20 price for people who buy in advance or is that the walk up price too?

Looking at the KR website, that is selling tickets at £20 a piece too. Doesn't say anything about if it's different on the day, but I'd be very surprised if it was.

Perhaps some friendly KR fan can help us out on this. Shortly before the FC fans follow onto this forum and start arguing, obviously.

[iMcNamara said he was unaware of reports linking hooker Terry Newton with Wakefield.[/i www.sportinglife.com/rugbyleague ... uotes.html Good, lose Newton next season without a quality replacement and there will be plenty more games when we concede similar amounts of points as today.

[iMcNamara said he was unaware of reports linking hooker Terry Newton with Wakefield.[/i www.sportinglife.com/rugbyleague ... uotes.html Good, lose Newton next season without a quality replacement and there will be plenty more games when we concede similar amounts of points as today.

Never rated him any way

Sounded like a bit of a 'no comment' type statement to me from McNamara.

Dont worry he is off to Wakey next year.

I'd be worried. There's no-one the Bulls can recruit that will be as good as Newton. Especially with the influence he has on the field.

Julien Rinaldi

I think you and I must be watching different players.

Yep, you did indeed say that the crowd was "dreadful". I was part of that crowd and I do not consider myself to be "dreadful" nor in fact do I think that the vast majority were in any way "dreadful".

Worryingly low in numbers maybe, but each and everyone who was there wanted to be there.

Sorry to be a pedant, but you appear to have form for it.

I was referring to the size of the crowd. Surely that should have been bloody obvious given the context of my original post, and certainly from my reply to yours? And I'll thank you not to throw cheap insults at me.