If anybody on the 72 bus this morning was wondering why that weird looking man suddenly started laughing it was because he'd just read thisThe ruling also states that the Super League, which had voted on the basis it was owed more than £900,000, should be given no voting rights at all.

The Super League, via the Rugby Football League (RFL), had previously said the figure was money the club had received for playing in the Super League from television company Sky.

Yesterday, the RFL declined to comment on the decision.'"

So if the money was not from Sky for playing in super league, where is the Sky money!!

It's probably the 50% [mis]appropriated by the other clubs.

On the updated T&A article it states that Omar's legal fees will be added onto the administration costs and that the administrator is not personally liable. I hope this doesn't mean that Mr. Green will have to fund it?

The most amazing thing about this story is that FA has not posted anything about it. I was hoping for further and better particulars on why the RFL claim was allowed in the first place and why it has now been discounted. At the time I could understand the RFL/SL being able to claim any actual advances of Sky funding, but could not see how, if the bulls had delivered a team for a year that the Sky funding for that year could be clawed back. The teams wages had been paid, Sky had had their opportunity to televise our games, any clawback therefore over punitive.

Everyone's second-favourite thread is finally back!



As I informed the forum, Omar commenced court action in the High Court to set aside the dodgy creditor's meeting, which will now need to be re-held.

Fast Forward to March 2015 Super League, which had voted on the basis it was owed more than £900,000, should be given no voting rights at all.

Oops.