As he was driven to the ground, by a scrum half I may add, the momentum has caused his legs to elevate. Seymour hasn't physically done it himself, there's a subtle but important difference you don't seem to be able to grasp.

Seymour was guilty of a reckless tackle only because the players legs was high than the horizontal

receiving a butting might just get him off

Not by Seymour they wasn't, which is why there was nothing wrong with it.

You seem unable to grasp the fact if his legs are elevated in the tackle like that, it is a dangerous tackle. Where did the momentum come from?

The RFL Disciplinary panel will decide
End of.

For something to write about, if you had won by 70 this page wouldn't exist.

The one on Crookes by Seymour.



Well done on resorting to name calling and swearing.


Not sure what you are referring to here.

It's only a dangerous tackle if the tackler raises the legs himself, Seymour didn't.
The momentum came from his upper body being driven into the ground.

The position he was tackled, momentun shift, body weight, reaction.......your not getting it are you
It wasn't classed as a spear tackle as he wasn't " speared", he got a good hit, got hurt , reacted............

Your making a mountain outa a mole hill mate

By Seymour. Therefore Seymour caused his legs to raise.

At the end of the day, no player was badly injured it should have been a penalty but it wasn't and made f all difference. I think we should be debating the Jeffries sin binning more!

It was a penalty.

So everytime the legs go above the head you think it's a penalty?

youtube "De Belin Thaiday"

ok

Ben deliberately took Briscoe out of play so that the defense could get back in line

professional foul and should be penalised more often, wished they had the balls more often to do this