Nothing really. But for a brief recap, I would go back and read FAs posts, make a cup of tea first though, oh and you may need a snack.

Nothing apart from the board has a vague wiff of homoerotic undertones from certain quarters.

Time to take the hint from other posters FA, and move on from your conspiracy theory. Section 4.7 has been correctly applied to penalise BBNL irrespective of whatever happened before, and that enables BBNL to appeal against it. If you are still unhappy about it, write to the RFL instead of whinging interminably about these perceived wrongs and spare the other posters a lot of tedium

You are aware, aren't you, that it isn't compulsory to read any particular post?

Pot kettle black.

FA, what did you think when you read this in the TnA article about the appeal?

“The notice of intention to appeal was lodged with the Rugby Football League, by former administrator David Wilson...".

The kite you were flying already had a large hole in it even before I advised you that 4.7 could apply to each of bb2014 and bbnl, and now it seems that the administrator is deemed to be a controlling person of the Club even though not incorporated. the administrator certainly was never an owner, nor was he deducted 6 points.

As you say, you don't have to read every post.

Right, I'm sure I speak for many on here when I say that this discussion is boring as hell. At the moment it's all just conjecture and guess work.

So lets all put it away until the hearing has happened and then pick the bones out of that one?

What he said...

I am getting fed up of this thread but have to respond as Yet again you get it wrong. The administrator did NOT lodge an appeal. OK Bulls Ltd (in administration) lodged the appeal. As it is a company, it can only act by it's duly authorised officers or in this case it's administrator who takes over their duties, but that does not alter the fact that the appeal is by OK Bulls Ltd. Or was, before the new owners, BBNL, made an unprecedented but successful application to take over the appeal.

The administrator is NOT the controlling person of OKBL. He never owns a single share. But he has full power to RUN the company in place of the controlling person/s ie shareholders, out of whose hands the running of the business has been taken. Or maybe you think that the administrator did become a controlling person, if so you need to remind me just when he passed the RFL's fit and proper person test as all new controlling parties must do?

I wonder when this second new director will be announced.

Can he play in the front row?

[url=http://imgur.com/DoOwTv0This says otherwise.[/url