Spoken like a true fan.

Statement from Steve Ferres regarding yesterdays game. At the bottom of the article is this: Quote Meanwhile, Ferres has explained how comments made on social media by the club's football manager are being dealt with internally. “On behalf of the the Bulls, I would like to formally apologise for the comments made and any offence caused by them,” added Ferres. “We are looking into the matter and appropriate action will be taken, internally.”'" www.bradfordbulls.co.uk/news/art ... s-faithful

Statement from Steve Ferres regarding yesterdays game. At the bottom of the article is this: Quote Meanwhile, Ferres has explained how comments made on social media by the club's football manager are being dealt with internally. “On behalf of the the Bulls, I would like to formally apologise for the comments made and any offence caused by them,” added Ferres. “We are looking into the matter and appropriate action will be taken, internally.”'" www.bradfordbulls.co.uk/news/art ... s-faithful

Interview without coffee for Mr Duffy.



Where's Mystic Eddie? He'd be loving this?

Perhaps this helps m.psychologytoday.com/blog/fulfi ... ports-fans

Perhaps this helps m.psychologytoday.com/blog/fulfi ... ports-fans

I wonder if SD knows the Fosbury Flop?

My thought process behind not going was that I needed to clean under my finger nails, which I then didn't do.

It is an inescapable fact that those who choose to stay away due to poor form [ialways[/i miss the best match of the lot -that first victory which inevitably turns it all around.

Just hoping we have turned it round, of course, and it's not just another, soon to be forgotten, blip on our wayward trajectory to the end of the season..

RFL Operational Rules: Definitions k (Club) al (Member) ar (Person subject to the Operational Rules
A1 Membership and Membership Obligations
D1 Offences Penalties and Enquiries D1.11 onwards and in particular
D1:25 The Operational Rules Tribunal and Operational Rules Appeals Tribunal shall have the power to order any Person subject to the Operational Rules to pay compensation and/or shall have power to reprimand, fine and/or suspend or expel from participation in the Game any Person Subject to the Operational Rules or any Representative or his/her Deputy or Member if found guilty of misconduct or aiding or abetting another so to do. In addition in the case of Misconduct which impinges on the integrity of the competition the Operational Rules Tribunal shall have the right to deduct competition points. The Operational Rules Tribunal and Operational Rules Appeals Tribunal shall be free to disregard any scales of mandatory fines published by the Board as guidance. Suspensions imposed by the Operational Rules Tribunal and Operational Rules Appeals Tribunal shall take effect from midnight on the day of the hearing unless the Operational Rules Tribunal or Operational Rules Appeals Tribunal orders to the contrary.

and finally, bye-laws 4.

[url=http://www.thetelegraphandargus.co.uk/sport/sportbulls/11178165.Former_Bulls_boss_pursued_for___905_000_by_Rugby_Football_League/latest nonsence[/url

Has anybody read this article today? Do you understand wtf is going on with these claims and if so could you explain more clearly the implications than the t&a have managed?

If my reading is correct;

Omar has agreed to pay back the council debt of 200k.
The RFL want Omar to pay back every penny the club received from sky/central funding from August 2012 to February 28 2014, a figure of £905k. (the majority of which is presumeably the normal (albeit halved) sky tv money.
Omar only disagrees on the amount, not that he's personally liable.
Omar has a claim aginast something/somebody/himself?? for £998k
The current club under Marc Green owe nothing and have no liabilities.


I have literally no idea what to make of it.

Why is OK personally liable for repayment of Sky money? I don't get that.

The administrator thinks that OK Bulls went bust owing Omar about £400k. Omar thinks that he's actually owed £1.3m? the £400k + the £900k that the article is going on about.

But the carcass of ok bulls was bought by mark green for £200k, which paid the administrator then himself. Leaving £0 for the other creditors, including Omar.

The £900k Omar got from the RFL central funds will have gone straight to wages for players. So I also am unclear on why the RFL want it back, as it hasn't been lost to the game or anything.

The RFL were always very keen to stress that over the last 2years their main concern was paying the players & competition integrity. Omar paid the players & built up big debts as well.

Of course, if the RFL got any of this money, they would immediately use it to pay off the creditors

who lost out again when the RFL rubber stamped Omar as the correct man to take the club forwards last year.....

Let me get this right…

OK agreed/was forced to give up a years sky money split over 2 seasons
OK agreed/forced to sign a deal where if the Bulls were insolvent in 2013/14 season he would repay all central funding received

So Bulls actually look like losing 1.5 years funding approx.?? WTF RFL/OK?
Surely if the Bulls were insolvent (as occurred) there wasn’t enough money, not a surplus to pay the RFL back……

Am I reading this right?